Canelo V GGG 3 ref and judges announced

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MGGGM Grand, Aug 26, 2022.


  1. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,965
    9,801
    Aug 1, 2012
    :facepalm:
     
  2. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,848
    2,552
    Mar 24, 2005
    How many rounds did the Wranger win against Lara? Honestly.
     
  3. MorvidusStyle

    MorvidusStyle Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,627
    5,937
    Jul 11, 2017
    For the record, if you don't understand how a fight can be fixed or full of corruption even though the B-side still gets the decision, for instance the Bivol-Canelo fight or the two Usyk-AJ fights, or even the first Golovkin-Canelo result(where the draw was the robbery), try to comprehend that it's a handicapping situation. You can't ever get 'everyone' in on it as it becomes too obvious. And actually not everyone is able to be corrupted.

    The point is you stack the odds in your favour and therefore you have a good chance of getting the outcome you want. It's not perfect though and you can still lose. Just like with a Casino that stacks the odds but people still beat the house sometimes.

    But over time the corrupt side will tend to win most of these corrupt fights. That's why Canelo has more close results that went in his favour than otherwise.
     
    MismatchHypejob likes this.
  4. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    27,161
    9,999
    May 29, 2007
    You sound worried that what he predicts will happen!
     
  5. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,955
    7,661
    Nov 2, 2010
    They fooled people twice already. You have to prepare for the disappointment. If GGG KO's Canelo then then the inevitable won't have to happen.
     
  6. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    27,161
    9,999
    May 29, 2007
    Means you have no evidence of him being handed cash in an envelope.
     
    Fourth_Horseman likes this.
  7. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,955
    7,661
    Nov 2, 2010
    People would have tolerated the 2nd fight results if their was no robbery in the first fight.
     
  8. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,010
    13,244
    Dec 2, 2012
    I agree. The anger from the outcome in the first fight carried some bias into the rematch.
     
  9. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,955
    7,661
    Nov 2, 2010
    It was either a fix or the judges are ret@#%&#. How come the results always favor Canelo? Instead of 10-2 for Bivol they make it 7-5. GGG only beats Canelo 8-4 or 9-3 usually, so that puts him in danger of being robbed.
     
    OldSchoolBoxing likes this.
  10. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,955
    7,661
    Nov 2, 2010
    No, the judges give favoritism towards Canelo in a big way. Hopefully a 168lb version of GGG takes it out of the judges hands.
     
    OldSchoolBoxing likes this.
  11. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,965
    9,801
    Aug 1, 2012
    And why would that be? Because "people" have an easier time giving Canelo rounds when he's coming forward and being aggressive rather than fighting off the backfoot? But then when the shoe is on the other foot, and Lara fights Canelo off the backfoot, with Canelo coming forward, they still say Canelo was getting favorable scoring. "But he was the aggressor". This logic makes no sense.

    Canelo arguably did better in the first fight and GGG did better than the rematch. But more people didn't score as many rounds for Canelo the first time because of a "style preference". Because of some whack idea that he had to "take the fight to the Champ" in order to beat GGG. Like GGG had some inherent built-in advantage because he was the Champ. Like Canelo had to fight in a style that benefitted GGG or he couldn't win. He actually proved that he could do that with how he fought in the rematch, but if there wasn't such phony outrage after the first fight he never would have had to.

    By that Logic, GGG would have to "take the fight to the Champ" in order to beat him this time since he's now the challenger and Canelo is the Undisputed Defending Champ. Style preferences should not have any bearing on the scoring, it's how effective you are at fighting in the style you fight in. If you're aggressive but you aren't landing clean or effective, like GGG in fight 1 for most of the fight, then it's worse than fighting off the backfoot. If you're aggressive but you are landing clean and effective, like Canelo in the rematch, that's better than fighting off the backfoot. Trying to draw lines in the sand on how one fighter can fight but how the other can't is agenda-driven warped scoring.
     
    box33 likes this.
  12. sdot_thadon

    sdot_thadon Active Member Full Member

    1,085
    734
    Jun 6, 2009
    So many excuses, so many tears...3 weeks out. Jesus. Why not hope for a spirited affair between 2 guys who have had alot to say about one another and live with the results. Some of you have legit been crying for half a decade over this matchup. Ggg hasn't even cared enough about his career to take many legitimate fights since the 1st one. You guys care more than he does.
     
    box33, ElCyclon and shadow111 like this.
  13. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,955
    7,661
    Nov 2, 2010
    But even in relatively close fights Canelo will be way ahead on some cards, fore instance the Cotto fight. Cotto never stood a chance.
     
  14. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,955
    7,661
    Nov 2, 2010
    Golovkin won both fights. Out worked him in the first and outboxed him in the 2nd. Hopefully he will KO him this time. It should be great.
     
  15. MismatchHypejob

    MismatchHypejob Active Member Full Member

    1,391
    1,431
    Aug 24, 2022
    Ref is Russell Mora from the fixed Kovalev fight. GGG taking a dive confirmed
     
    iii, lordlosh and OldSchoolBoxing like this.