usyk vs muhammad ali

Ohh my God. On top of everything else you’re one of those who says Usyk is “Small” with “No power” While fronting like you’re a keyboard Bert Sugar.

Wow. You aren’t even worth going back and forth with

Have a good one there professor

 

I despair.

Another great addition to the forum.


You’re supposed to be looking at a fantasy fight between both guys in their prime.

You’re supposed to be looking at how realistically they’d have matched up on the night.


Why would you even mention the Spinks fight?

What next, Berbick and Holmes?


My logic isn’t based on the Briedis fight, Einstein.

That was an example of HOW YOU are debating.


Run along you donut.

 

He has already dominated an era of fighters at CW that all would be fairly big HWs during Ali's time (especially the 60's and early 70's). He has beaten about half a dozen world class fighters that all would be HWs during Ali's time, so it's not like he's untested against men that size.

 

Usyk is small with no power.

Which is why he’d match up with some guys, better than he would with others.

He matched up well with AJ, because he was elusive.

Being small isn’t always a disadvantage.

It depends who you’re fighting.

Mike Tyson’s small stature often worked in his favour. It was an advantage to him.

 

Ali was ahead on all the cards when he stopped Mildenberger, unlike Usyk when he stopped Belew, who was KO'd at LHW.

Mildenberger was tricky for Ali in the early going, but "life and death" is just silly.

 

I think Ali edges it on work rate. He has a big speed advantage on Usyk.

 

He is odd I asked him name a fighter who was a mid/high level ranked fighter from 70s-now who fought exactly like Joe and max he refuses

 

I’ve already answered your question.

So you’re obviously just trolling.

Nobody fought like Joe did in that clip.

HOWEVER, Joe HIMSELF didn’t ALWAYS fight like he did in that clip.

He fought differently in the rematch, as well as in the Conn fights along with many others.

Your video is not a true reflection of how he fought.

Joe Louis would have done fine in both the 70’s and the 90’s.

He had a lot of great attributes, and was BETTER than many of the LESSER fighters who found success in those eras, as well as some of the fighters in this current era.


There’s nothing remotely outdated about this:

This content is protected

Go and look at today’s top 10, and look at how they all fight.

Lesser fighters than Louis have troubled AJ, Fury and Usyk etc.

Ruiz and Wilder etc, only wished that they had the skill set of Joe Louis.


Both of you clowns need banning from the forum.

You’re obviously 2 alts.

 

Where am I trolling at by asking you directly to answer my question? and I dont know where that comes from that I'm 2 accounts he isnt aggressive as I am

Find where you answered my question the exact way I asked for which is names only from 70s-now mid/high fighter who were top ranked find the names cause I dont see anywhere where you gave me names only which is what I specifically asked for multiple times I didn't ask for anything else from you...

Cause I gave you 1 match from Joe and max who he fought i can show other matches that shows those 2 moved the same in every match

As I said earlier I asked chok a direct question I got a direct answer same with 70s they answered me directly why can't you

 

I’ve seen him on here totally dismissing the 168 GOAT before too. He DKSAB

 

He knows just stuck in era's and refuses to just admit what videos show

 

Being taller is always an advantage, but some short people know how to fight in a way that makes use of their diminutive stature. Ie they don't try to fight much taller opponents like they are the same size. Torrez and Tyson are really good examples of guys who knew how to fight like a short person, whereas on the other end Tua and Povetkin tried to fight like they were the same height as their opponents only with less reach.

 

Taller isn't always a advantage when the person is facing a person a person who they might have a stylistic or skills disadvantage against or a person could just could not be know how to use their reach good

 

Actually, I'll rephrase. "Being taller is always an advantage as long as the taller person knows how to use their height".