Usyk vs Ibeabuchi

Ibeabuchi gets overrated by some imo. Guy got arguably outboxed by David Tua. Usyk makes him look stupid for 12 rounds with a couple of startling moments here and there. Much like the Joshua fights.

Usyk 10-2 or maybe 9-3

 

Yeah, like they've invented a new way to throw a hook!

 

Here you are again with this nonsense.

Outdated skills?

Ha!

Get real you fool.

 

Well, certain members are holding on to what they once had

 

I gave you 2 chances to prove me wrong instead you went around avoiding the answer so yea I think I have the right to use those words outdated what's the problem with it? I obviously must be right or you would have answered my simple question

What did you have to eat today loudon? names the ingredient

Bought a car i ask which model
I get the time you bought it and the size of it

Repeat the question I get the time instead this is how you are is it not?

Chok answered my questions directly why can't you what is this avoiding simple questions for?

 

He may well get overrated but i still think he presents a difficult challenge for Usyk, as i stated above Ibeabuchi can average 80 punches thrown a round, hits hard with both hands, his chin is granite as evident in the Tua fight. And he wouldn't be fighting cautiously like Joshua did, he would be putting alot of pressure on Usyk forcing him to fight.

Now i'm not saying Usyk doesn't win this fight, but i wouldn't just see this as come clear cut win for Usyk. Ibeabuchi was a very dangerous Heavyweight, and i think he presents more of a threat than Joshua did to Usyk.

 

Skills Pay The Bills. We know who is more skilled and has a better ring IQ

 

I said the same thing ike was dangerous usky isnt hard to hurt its obvious that would be a dangerous fight for him

 

What a CLOWN.

I have PROVEN to you that Joe Louis didn’t always fight like he did against Schmelling in their first fight.

I UPLOADED the rematch for you.

Go and WATCH it.

Go and watch the Conn fights.

Go and watch some more of Louis’ career.

You keep whining about how he couldn’t have found success in the 70’s and 90’s based on just ONE video of where he was slower, due to being a little cautious.

You are an ignoramus, pure and simple.

Joe Louis DID NOT always fight in the way that you believe he did.

You have zero knowledge of the man’s career, where you’ve looked at just one fight.

Again, the rematch and the Conn fights prove you wrong.

Again, LESSER, SLOWER fighters than Louis, with LESS dynamic styles HAD success in those eras which you have mentioned.

Go and educate yourself.

There’s no such thing as an outdated style.

You’re too thick to even realise that I HAVE answered you.

I’ve even used your own piece of evidence against you.

 

name a fighter who was a mid/high level ranked fighter from 70s-now who fought like I showed the video of joe and max i want exactly those 2 styles that you seen on that video name the people im asking this agian

I want my question answered with names only can I have that i dont want anything else

 

This will be my last post to you because you’re obviously extremely hard of thinking.

You keep asking this question over and over, YET Louis and Schmelling DID NOT ALWAYS fight in that style.

Now read that back and try and digest it.

Try and absorb the information.

If you watch the Conn fight/fights, as well as the rematch that I posted, this will be evident to you.

Don’t bother replying back.

I’m not going to waste any more of my time on you.

 

Good job not answering which proves me right no name means no one ever fought exactly like they did who was a ranked mid/high level fighter from 70s-now its not been one since the years these 2 fought

Which means no those outdated styles wouldn't work and you know they wouldn't or you would have answered me directly yesterday

 

I despair.


Are you capable of tying your own shoe laces?

Can you dress yourself in a morning?

Is it safe for you to go out on your own?


What do you not understand??

The styles that you are looking at, was from that ONE fight.

Why is this so difficult for you to comprehend??


Again, if you looked at some of their OTHER FIGHTS, you would see that they both fought IN A DIFFERENT MANNER, WITH DIFFERENT STYLES, depending on their opposition.


It would be like saying that Ali’s ‘Rope a Dope’ wouldn’t always be effective, therefore he wouldn’t be successful today.

Yet he DIDN’T ALWAYS employ those tactics.

It was only for the Foreman fight.

Yet that is the logic that you are using.


Do you understand??

Do you need me to draw it out on paper for you?

You are whining about their styles, when I can prove, and have proven, that they didn’t ALWAYS fight like that.


They didn’t have outdated styles.

Again, lesser fighters with more BASIC styles, DID find success years later.


Now I’m done with you, you absolute SIMPLETON.


Don’t reply back.


Go and waste someone else’s time with your stupid questions.

 

Watch the video below, Einstein:

Joe would have done fine in any era.

This content is protected

 

This @Monnever tool is just an alt account user... Just joined last Friday... just a troll.