Again that's your opinion. But your views on the first and second are niche to say the least. Judging by after both fights about 1% of people would hold those views.
Actually this site doesnt even make up for a fraction of what the real world thinks. Ive talked to GGG fans in person and they have said Canelo won the 2nd fight fair and square. It is what it is.
'Of the 18 media outlets scoring the bout, 10 ruled in favor of Golovkin, 7 scored a draw, while 1 scored the bout for Álvarez' This is a quote about the medias opinion on the fight (the media is mostly american and would favour Canelo). 1 out of 18 outlets had Alvarez winning the second fight. Canelo winning the second fight is an opinion which is in an incredible minority. GGG outlanded canelo in both the first and second fight. Again its your opinion but its a very rare opinion to find. The vast majority think that GGG won both 1 and 2 and the stats back that up
so punch stats, dodgy score cards the opinions of the majority of people all are irrelevent? again im not saying your opinion is invalid. Im saying it is an opinion barely no one has
Majority of people where? On social media? Are you telling me that the billions of people on earth that dont post on social media websites dont matter at all?
former boxers, commentators, boxing media outlets, majority of posters on boxing site etc etc etc. By every way we normally measure the opinion on a boxing decision
Nah.....your boy GGG got beaten in the 3rd match. Just accept the truth CST80. I am a GGG fan but I am not a Canelo fan I swear, but the lattet won the third match closely and fairly. IMO. the first match GGG won it, the second match was a draw (could have gone either way), and the third match Canelo won it. So, Their record was 1-1-1. They both are the legendary fighters of the MW Division. BTW, your prediction was wrong again like I said while my prediction was right.
so unless we poll the entire world on their opinion on a boxing match we can never call a fight a robbery? lmfao this is intense logic
You can call it a robbery, but at least point out facts to why its such. Everybody has an opinion. Bit juat dont refer to media and so called boxing experts when rhey make up the minority of what the boxing world thinks.
i did point out why it was a robbery. punch stats, dodgy scorecards, the vast majority of people who watched thought it was robbery. objective reality indicated those two fights were robberies Maybe in Mexico land they dont think they were robberies but they are hardly objective and are only a minority