Ennis is the perfect combination of Power, Athleticism, and elite skill. The best comparisons I can think of are a combination of traits from Roy Jones, Marc Too Sharp, and Ray Robinson. Shakur is a beautiful boxer. He has elite footwork,m counter-punching, timing, and a mean streak. He reminds me a lot of Floyd Mayweather (minus the athleticism but he seems to be a slightly better counter-puncher and defender, whereas Floyd was better at fighting at all ranges.) Shakur appears to have a lot of competition: Haney, Davis, Ryan, Frank, Chris Colbert, and Loma. Ennis has Crawford, Thurman, Spence, Charlo, Tszyu, Monreal, Castano, and many others. If I had to bet my money, I think Ennis will go down as the better fighter but Shakur will go down as the greater fighter, due to having better options in opponents. Thoughts?
Why do you say? Outside of Crawford and Spence, who does he have to solidify his greatness? Let's take Leonard vs Floyd. Floyd is without a doubt a more skilled fighter than Leonard, but Leonard is widely considered much greater due to his resume: Hearns, Duran, Hagler, and Benietez.
WHo does Shakur have to solidify his? Lopez, Haney, Kingry and Tank will all be at 140 soon, so I doubt he gets a crack at any of them, and even an old shot Lomachenko beats Shakur with ease.
Shakur has already proved himself. Big fan of boots but he is yet to have his marquee fight. Im waiting patiently but hes got the talent, just needs the fights to catapult him to the top.
Super Boots is a legit monster Knocking out CWs in sparring This content is protected Shakur looks the same size as Super Boots but he's not knocking out leprechauns This content is protected
Ennis is clearly the better fighter, and will have a better career. Stevenson is just an overrated, carefully-matched weight bully.