Why is GGG considered "elite" but not Spence?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingIQ, Sep 26, 2022.


  1. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,053
    948
    Nov 6, 2017
    There a lot of boxing fans, across the board, who states that Spence isn't elite but GGG is. I want to know why? GGG has the edge in power, jab, chin, and maybe footwork but that's about it. Spence is the better counter-pucher, just as good at cutting off the ring and fighting on the inside, he has the better defender, and he is much more athletic. Can someone explain to me why Spence doesn't get as much credit as GGG even though he has the better resume and has been more consistent?
     
    Willie Maeket and Toney F*** U like this.
  2. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,269
    39,688
    Jan 22, 2015
  3. JunlongXiFan

    JunlongXiFan 45-6 in Kirks Chmpionshp Boxing Predictions 2022 Full Member

    5,963
    6,389
    Aug 9, 2020
    GGG is more highly regarded because GGG was widely viewed as the best at 160 whereas Spence is viewed as being inferior to Crawford despite being a weight bully. That said though, Spence is viewed by elite by almost everybody and makes the top ten pound for pound of the vast majority of fans' lists, and maybe even top 5 on most fans' lists.
     
  4. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,053
    948
    Nov 6, 2017
    Spence inferior to Crawford? Spence has fought the better competition and he does some things better than Crawford (inside fighting, jab, pivoting, creating angles, and defense). There is not this huge disparity between Crawford and Spence that people on this board make it seem.
     
    DaRealJT and drenlou like this.
  5. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,699
    4,382
    Dec 5, 2010
    Both are considered elite. Terrible thread.

    People are frustrated with Spence for the Crawford situation. GGG fights big time fights and was signed to fight PIROG when both were unknown.
     
  6. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    23,739
    26,827
    Feb 10, 2011
    He is elite, but he's missing a name on his resume. You elevate yourself higher by fighting your main rival, which Spence hasn't done.

    GGG has fought his main rival Canelo 3 times. He proved his elite skills by beating Alvarez twice and getting robbed twice.

    Spence has yet to fight Crawford once. If he loses to Crawford badly, nobody will think he's on GGG's level. If he wins, there will no doubts.
     
  7. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,603
    130,073
    Jul 21, 2009
    Huh? He's ranked #4 P4P by The Ring

    #3 By ESPN the last time I saw their rankings

    CBS had him at #2 the last time I saw theirs

    Very good fighter but he's done nothing to warrant such a lofty ranking

    Ranked above Usyk by two of them which is utterly ridiculous :facepalm:
     
  8. JOKER

    JOKER Froat rike butterfry, sting rike MFER! banned Full Member

    16,514
    18,128
    Dec 18, 2019
    Golovkin = small middleweight

    Spence = big ass weight bully who faked an eye injury to swerve a 42 year part time boxer and midget
     
    Punchdrunk1 likes this.
  9. Snails

    Snails Active Member Full Member

    1,428
    1,706
    May 26, 2021
    Because Golovkin is one of the most skilled fighters of our generation whilst Spence is not.
     
    MorvidusStyle likes this.
  10. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,907
    27,366
    Jul 26, 2004
    Idk... I think the thread is rather baseless to be honest, if we are talking in general. I doubt many people rate today's Golovkin much higher than Spence, if at all.
     
  11. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,053
    948
    Nov 6, 2017
    How can you blame Spence for this situation?
     
  12. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,053
    948
    Nov 6, 2017
    Crawford has been consistently rank top 3 but his resume is worse than Spence, GGG, Canelo, Bivol, Inoue, Loma, Charlo, and even Josh Taylor. Explain that? Hell, an argument could be made that Thurman's resume is superior.
     
    TheShellofKell likes this.
  13. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    23,739
    26,827
    Feb 10, 2011
    Crawford’s resume is weak, and many People will agree with that. Spence’s resume is better and many people will agree with that.

    People rank Crawford higher because he is more dominant in his victories.

    At the end of the day, the fans just want to see them fight each other. The winner will get all the glory.
     
  14. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,603
    130,073
    Jul 21, 2009
    Er. Crawford's ranking has always been too high too. His resume is poor but at least he's a three weight champ with P4P skills
     
  15. jaytxxl

    jaytxxl Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    3,479
    Mar 1, 2010
    Exactly show me where they don’t consider Spence elite when he’s literally ranked top 4-5 P4P by every major rankings system..
     
    Betyabeatyaup likes this.