Canelo GGG 3 Press scores?

I'm applying the same logic that was used for the first 2 fights. My score that Canelo won the first fight was said to be wrong because of "press scores". Good ol @C.J. was the biggest "press row scorer" proponent of them all lol, always reminding us of how the press scored in favor of GGG.

Well now the shoe is on the other foot isn't it. And it's not "just" the press scores. On the night, pretty much everyone saw the fight as a one-sided, not close fight. Now we're seeing a few bold GGG fanboys trying to argue it was close, that it was reallty a 7-5 type of fight, agreeing with the official judges. Yet the press scores have very wide, mostly 11 rounds to 1. Yet I'm being told Canelo only won 7 rounds to 5, 115-113, a score that was universally ridiculed on the night. You can't make this stuff up.

 

You were the biggest "but but the press scores" guy after the first 2 fights. Where's your precious press scores now lol. Canelo 11 rounds to 1. You, the guy who called the judges corrupt and cited the press scores ad nauseam has done a complete 180 this time after a thorough domination by Canelo. Now you're lock step in line wth the "corrupt judges" and you don't wanna hear about the press scores. How convienient lol.

 

I had to dig to find all these scores manually. I haven't seen a single press score cited on this forum since the result before this topic, which is no coincidence. After the first 2 fights, we seen complete lists of all the press scorers and they were cited repeatedly on this forum when the scoring was discussed. But after Canelo dominated GGG, but the judges had it close (which I predicted would happen by the way, that GGG would get favorable scoring) I can't find a single "complete list" of all the press scores, of pro boxers scores, etc like we seen in past fights. Thus far I've only been able to find a fraction of the press scorers compared to other fights, and I had to dig to find them.

So no, the press scres are not where they usually are. A good chunk of them are suspiciously missing. And if anyone can find more scores, please post them here so we can get a complete list.

They aren't being discussed because Canelo dominated GGG, pitched a near shutout and GGG fanboys are coming on here trying to argue it was a close 7-5 type of fight because they refuse to admit that how one-sided it was. I'm here to remind them. And they use excuses like GGG's 40. Pac decisioned Thurman in his 40s, I didn't see people making excuses for Pac being in his 40s when that happened. 39 year old Marquez knocked Pac TFO, I didn't hear people using age as an excuse then, or when Hopkins beat Jean Pascal and many others in his 40s. GGG may well go on a run in his 40s, then what'll people say.

People trying to discredit Canelo anytime he does anything is nothing new. They tried to discredit Canelo after he beat Plant, saying Plant wasn't very good. Well Plant just K Dirrell TFO. People gotta face the facts, what Canelo did to GGG in the 3rd fight was a master class. It was not even remotely close until the last 4 rounds, and people gave GGG those late rounds out of pity because he finally started being competitive. I'm reminding people of what the consensus reaction was to the decision, which was outrage due to how close it was since it was seen universally as a very one-sided domination. I got posters trying to tell me it was a close, 7-5 type of fight like that one judges had it lol which is hilarious.

I told ya'll that the judges would be very favorable to GGG, probably because he's 40, and because the judges had to listen to the GGG fanboy crying for 4-5 years about how they should have scored the first 2 for GGG. They over compensated in this 3rd fight by scoring any round that GGG did more than nothing to him, they made a one-sided fight close and I'm reminding you that the public who watched it were outraged by those scores, pretty much everybody on the night saw a Canelo dominaton, it was a 11-1, 10-2, 9-3 type of fight. The judges went to bat for GGG, and their scores were universally ridiculed. This was one-sided ass kicking. Everyone saw it that way except for a handful of deluded GGG fanboys and judges who were scoring favorably to GGG.

 

CBS Sports 118-110 Canelo
Yahoo Sports 120-108 Canelo

Bad Left Hook 118-110 Canelo
Bad Left Hook 119-109 Canelo

Tom Gray RingTV 119-109 Canelo
Boxing Junkie 119-109 Canelo

Big Fight Weekend 119-109 Canelo
DKNation Staff 119-109 Canelo

Paul Magno The Boxing Tribune 117-111 Canelo

Stephen Sanchez 118-110 Canelo
The Guardian 119-109 Canelo

MMA Fighting 119-109 Canelo
8 Deportivo 119-109 Canelo

 

That's not how it works wise guy. The consensus Press scores in the first 2 fights were much closer than the 3rd fight.

The average press score in the first fight was about 7-5 GGG. The average press score in the second fight was about a draw. The average press score in the 3rd fight was like 11-1 Canelo. If we go by press scores, we had 2 fights that could go either way then a complete domination by Canelo.

 

I'm bringing up press scores for the 3rd fight, you're trying to steer us back to the press scorers of the first 2 fights because your view of the 3rd fight is wildly inconsistent with the consensus press scores. You're trying to argue that it was close, the consensus clearly did not see it as close. In the first 2 fights, the consensus while they favored GGG winning, saw both fights as close. They favored GGG in the first fight largely due to expectation and style preferences. But no one had that first fight 11-1 GGG now did they. Of course not, because it was extremely close with multiple swing rounds that most gave to GGG, mainly for being aggressive and throwing more punches.

The consensus press scores while favoring GGG for the first 2 fights (the rematch less so, which had a healthy split and many calling it a draw) clearly saw both fights as highly competitive and close. The 3rd fight, unlike the first 2 fights, clearly saw it as a one-sided domination.

 

Press scores :
Fight 1 : Close, could go either way
Fight 2 : Close, could go either way
Fight 3 : Canelo one-sided domination

 

This post suggests that you didn't think it was one-sided, as you argued "Canelo disappointed" "all he did was tap tap the entire fight":

All Canelo did is pitch a near shutout. All Canelo did was dominate GGG, landing big shots on him, which made it one-sided because those big shots made the first 8 rounds easy to score.