Does being undefeated mean anything anymore?

You and that geezer miniq are proper comedians. While he's trolling, I believe you are sincerely a cheerleader, and it's utterly embarrassing to read a grown a** man being so consistently biased and defensive over a boxer.

 

miniq is mokcing at people and their lack of objectivity. But imagine how I consider a slob who spends his time reading consistently what some forum members do - it isn't funny, but pathetic and even sad.

 

Are you implying I go out of my way to exclusively read your quality posts? lol
Since you have about 400 posts in two months it's hard to avoid what you've got on your mind. Run along, sweetheart. Let's stick to the subject and not dilute the thread further.

Does being undefeated mean anything? If you're facing quality opposition consistently yes.
If you're Tyson Fury - no.

 

I see you're still on me, dear. Pass that stage of your pathetic life, there is a lot to read here, forget about me.

 

Depends on who you lose to and if you can spin the block to get ur revenge especially in a dominant fashion. I think Canelo needed that loss to Mayweather. Lewis stopping the guys who beat him makes him look better. List goes on.


Also, when u loss. Did u lose while u were green, during ur prime years, while u were fading and/or once they could put a fork in you? Sum fighters bite off more than they can chew but I respect their bravery. Most stay too long bcuz of financial misfortune then rack up losses to ppl they would licked when they were young or young-ish.

 

Lol.

 

Always felt that undisputed is far more respected, particularly by true followers of the art.