Inoue hasn't shown he can even move up 1 weight class and win there yet, and you're going to put him over a Usyk who can move up to the only weight class with no weight cap, and win the belts there too? Lol
You're insufferable. Your every post makes Tyson Fury less popular. You may be obsessively in love with him, but you're inadvertently his worst enemy.
He's utilising self-parody. This infuriates people who don't get it and is, of course, something that Fury is also fond of.
The notion of P4P is insufferable Usyk & Fury don't care about this nonsense because they're real G's. Crawford & Canelo do because they're frauds.
Inoue, then Usyk. But it's close between them. I judge these things by quality of opposition & performance, not by title belts, perfect records, multi-divisional "championships" and all that stuff. It's all about who they fought & who their opponents fought & the quality of their opponent's opponents, etc. Inoue and Usyk have been wonderful fighters, exhibiting very high skill levels, and have been awesome to watch.
Whoever voted for Crawford needs to come up with a very very very good explanation why, and no beating a semi retired commentator and a European level fighter do not equal P4P #1.
The level of blind Usyk nut huggery is astounding. Some of you folks really got the latent hots for this guy. He's an OK boxer, don't get me wrong but seriously. Get help.
Guy wins a gold medal and follows it up by masterfully cleaning out cruiserweight, establishing himself in the eyes of most as the GOAT in that division, and then beats Anthony Joshua twice at heavyweight to win multiple belts and somehow he's "an OK boxer"? Sounds a bit better than OK to me.