Don't think we should be tempted to go near that area, and another, on here ... errr .... confidentiality and all that. Please it's not in the 270 page report .. but .... Ginny Fuchs ?
I can't say which is worse, that or the juicing. A guy desperate enough for a beard transplant is not to be trusted.
Cos if you were genuinely innocent you would think how is this possible and you'd get the b sample tested straight away. When you are guilty you would think- fck I messed up my cycle, if I don't get the b sample tested there will always be an element of doubt
I'm just a casual, .... but I'm pretty confident this B-sample talk is b*ll*cks, as a result of EH, and the like, suggesting it is required for a "conviction". This b*ll*cks gets repeated on SM and "becomes the Truth". But ... It is not. An athlete is "guilty at the A-sample" until proven innocent. That's the way it is. An athlete cannot delay this. An athlete can, and is the ONLY person that can. request the B-sample be tested .. within 10 days I think for UKAD they rarely do because the results are pretty much ALWAYS the same as the A-sample, it would require the lab tested it wrong. They don't. It's all BS and misdirection by EH and the like, mostly as a delaying tactic / fan confusion. CB are highly unlikely to be claiming the test was wrong. More likely that Clomid got in his system unintentionally, via some "accidental/unintentional/contamination" method. That is not "innocent" of having it in his system, even unintentional is 2yr ban under UKAD. If he can't prove unintentional, then that should be a 4yr ban under UKAD. But UKAD has been possibly side-lined by CB giving up his UK licence. But the B-sample is irrelevant unless the lab tested the A-sample wrong, and CB requested the B-sample be tested and shows a different result. If that happened we would already know and all this sh*t would have gone away already. Don't get sucked into the EH b*llsh*t. If I'm talking crap I'll apologise and delete this post .... I can delete a post ......yes ????