Who has the better Resume? Fury or Big Dosser Femi?

Fury's top 10 wins
W Klitschko, Wilder x 2, Cunningham, Whyte, Wallin, Chisora x 3, Pavjik

Joshua's top 10 wins
W Klitschko, Povetkin, Ruiz, Parker, Pulev, Martin, Takam, Breazeale, Skelton, Johnson

I say Furys is better just slightly. And importantly Fury has never lost, Joshua's been beat 3 times.

 

Joshua has the better resume imo.

 

Joshua is the greatest ever to wear a pair of gloves imo - simply nobody is going to beat him with so much talent and potential

 

Both rubbish it`s like who is better between Crewe and Port Vale

 

0/10 for trolling

 

0/10 for your response

 

Both excellent fighters , Fury in particular is an all time great heavyweight. & Both with good resumes, so why talk ****.

 

You are right both are excellent fighters but both resumes are well below par

 

Joshua is the new breed of heavyweight and isn't a 12 round fighter, so all arguments are null and void.

He's in a category of one. Just like his cousin Benga, who isn't a regional Head of Security of Asda, but is head of security at an individual store. He can't be everything to all men.

 

Not the analogy i'd use but a good one nevertheless.

 

I have mentioned Ruiz losing the rematch you numpty. Last paragraph.

That said, running away from a fatty who made you quit 6 months previous is hardly elite level stuff.

 

Funny how people can actually think Joshua has the better record. The bloke has three losses and his only top level win is Fury's rotten leftovers. It beggars belief!

 

OK what measurable are you using in defining AJs elite resume while discrediting Fury’s?

Problem I have with AJ is that he hasn’t fought Wilder or Fury.

AJ is yet to go to hostile territory and win, I’d like to see him fight in an arena where fans are booing him and him fighting a 50/50 even 60/40 maybe then I’d agree with you on the resume thing but until then, Whyte, Martin, Molina, Breazele, Klitschko, Takam, Povetkin, Ruiz & Pulev are all subpar wins no real A plus wins.

 

This is how I would roughly position the wins:

Tier 1: Wilder 1 (Fury) Wilder 2 (Fury) Wilder 3 (Fury) Klitschko (Fury)

Tier 2: Klitschko (Joshua)

Tier 3: Whyte (Fury) Wallin (Fury) Chisora 1 and 2 (Fury) Povetkin (Joshua)

Tier 4: Parker (Joshua) Whyte (Joshua) Pulev (Joshua) Ruiz (Joshua) Cunningham (Fury)

Tier 5: Hammer (Fury) Breazeale (Joshua) Johnson (Fury) Takam (Joshua)

Tier 6: Pianeta (Fury) McDermott 1/2 (Fury) Schwarz (Fury) Chisora 3 (Fury)

Tier 7: Martin (Joshua) Molina (Joshua)

Then there's the three losses to take into account for Joshua, one of which an enormous, historic skidmark. This list is based on context. For instance, Martin and Molina came to lie down and thus cannot be considered above that. Ruiz is as low as Tier 4 because he was morbidly obese and had no ambition - had lost before he set foot in the ring. Parker 4 because he also had no ambition and it was a full on stinker. Whyte is lower for Joshua because he was inexperienced, out of shape and injured. Klitschko, for Joshua, is lower than all Wilder wins for Fury because he had one foot into retirement; two years older than the Fury win at 41, inactive, coming off a loss and fighting at Wembley. It showed with how gassed he was so early which we had never seen from Klitschko except in the Brewster bout.

 

Who is Wilder? He failed his big test... three times. I dont see how beating him means you have an elite win.

AJ went to Saudi and won an immediate rematch over the man that stopped him. Thats good enough for me.