93% vs 88% is accepting KO ratios and destroys your opinion with FACTS, what your doing is trying to move the goal post. SOWWEY
That 93% KO ratio is inflated due to Fank fighting 16 bums before he finally fought a guy that wasn't a corpse. If Inoue fought 16 bums to pad his record instead of chasing smoke in his 4th pro fight, he most assuredly would have a higher KO ratio than Fank. It's not rocket science. But I'm not putting that much into KO ratios because of the 4, only Beterbiev has a 100% KO ratio. And the P4P hardest puncher in boxing history has an 80% ratio. Be consistent.
Nah its not inflated, if it was he wouldnt be stopping these big dudes. Those are the facts. Julian Jackson had more fights than both combined too, dont leave out that fact broski!
And when Inoue moves up and he stops knocking dudes out, then what? Consistancy is the word you like to throw around, so if the consistancy stops what you going to try to convince us of then?
What do you mean then what? If he stops KOing dudes at 122 and up, it literally means his power didn't carry up.
Nah bruh, he aint isnt even dat heavy a puncha doe diggity dog! You done made this thread a little premature knaw mean.
Wilder, since he regularly gets outweighed by his opponents by ludicrous margins. Beterbiev is likely next, man has rocks for hands, shades of Marciano. Inoue is a shotgun puncher though. Pure technique. But hard to rate how his power will carry up.
Even for you, @Little brian, this is really funny. He certainly won't beat Beterbiev. Yarde being overrated by quite a few of the usual suspects on the forum.
Inoue is knocking out bigger guys and Tank is getting bullied by smaller guys lmao you know jack about boxing