More moderation for the British forum? Vote in the poll

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jan 19, 2023.


Is there problem in the British forum which you think would benefit from further moderation?

Poll closed Jan 21, 2023.
  1. Yes, further and altered moderation would help.

    28 vote(s)
    62.2%
  2. No, things should remain as they are.

    17 vote(s)
    37.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Murderers' Row

    Murderers' Row Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,442
    6,342
    Apr 23, 2020
    It's needed.
     
  2. Camaris

    Camaris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,403
    963
    Jul 11, 2012
    If you can make a case for curtailing free speech on the strength of something better than "he likes matchroom and I don't and he wont stop saying he likes matchroom!", or similar, then I'm all ears. I'm not having a pop, I just totally fail to see how more moderation will improve things.

    In my experience moderation kills forums. Apart from anything, the moderators themselves get sick of children whining on about "alts" and "but he said!" stuff, and their dislike for their own forum does quite a lot of damage. I think the relationship between moderators and posters on this forum has been good across the years. Changes would be a turn for the worse.
     
  3. Murderers' Row

    Murderers' Row Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,442
    6,342
    Apr 23, 2020
    The British forum used to be way better than the general. The general used to be full of kids arguing about nothing, constantly creating unnecessary threads. The British is just as bad as the general these days. The RBR threads used to be class and the banter was tip fecking top.

    I always get on well with the mods, especially in the lounge. Let's get this forum sorted for a bit and then hopefully we can go back to how it used to be.
     
    Special one and UKboxingfan like this.
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,773
    47,619
    Mar 21, 2007
    Fighting talk.
     
    Murderers' Row likes this.
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,773
    47,619
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well the case is that people really don't like the place. The case is that reporting is through the roof, and so are bans, which is why so many people are complaining about the reporting and the bans (And the resultant alts). This has been for a while, too.

    I've already laid out the case - it's no better or worse than it appears - and it looks like there will probably be some changes, as you say, that limit free speech.

    But about this "free speech" idea: it's not a clear one. People who talk it generally don't understand what they mean (no offence and maybe you do). If a Liverpool fan goes to an Everton bar and starts mouthing off about how **** Everton are, the bouncers remove him from the bar, sometimes with a physical warning :lol: You understand, intrinsically, that this is reasonable, you don't start crying about freedom of speech. Some sawdust bars allow almost anything; some in-between bars draw the line at football tops or rampant drunkeness; some posh bars won't even allow newspapapers or cursing - and there are rare places where you need a suit to attend. And all of them can change at the dorp of a hat.

    That's all an internet forum is. It has nothing to do with "freedom of speech".
     
    SeanB1 likes this.
  6. tee_birch

    tee_birch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,741
    4,892
    Jul 6, 2014
    Add one of the guys as a mod who only really stays in the British chat, may be more effective.
     
    Oreet Cha! and SeanB1 like this.
  7. Snowy1989

    Snowy1989 Active Member Full Member

    772
    1,100
    Dec 22, 2015
    Only really posted on the RBR threads and it was usually a good craic and seeing how others viewed a fight. Massively regressed over the last few months with good posters staying away and idiots like that Safin and army Jim just filling the place with drivel.

    As others have said, we don’t want to read about how sh1t Joshua and Matchroom are every thread; it’s obsessive.


    Seen PNE has incurred some heavy losses, what’s going on at Deepdale?
     
    Oreet Cha! likes this.
  8. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    9,813
    12,775
    Mar 24, 2019
    The problem is you just get banned without knowing why.Last year i said something like i am glad i didn`t pay for this after watching a boring fight.CST80 messaged me saying be careful less i get banned.I explained i meant not being at the actual fight not illegal streaming.He replied yes he thought that but but did not what my comments to be misconstrued.It would be helpul if more mods were like this
     
    CST80 and Special one like this.
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,773
    47,619
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well it's been laid out pretty explicitly in this thread; it's also laid out at the top of every RBR thread. I do agree it's helpful when mods pm posters abotu potential misunderstandings but I really do get frustrated by the signal theft thing. If you talk about the fight and how you watch it you MUST be careful about how you express yourself. Everyone knows that, but people still get caught out.
     
  10. Terminator

    Terminator Active Member Full Member

    991
    1,832
    Dec 9, 2020
    In the context of this analogy, this is a pro-Matchroom bar where any anti-Matchroom members that air their opinions are unwelcome and thrown out. You stated this was not the case in your original post. Which one is it?
     
  11. Camaris

    Camaris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,403
    963
    Jul 11, 2012
    With respect, I agree with everything you've set out re: freedom of speech, but believe it would be a mistake trying to apply the "you can't shout fire in a crowded cinema!" idea to an online forum. To be fair, I don't think you're suggesting we should. But I'd reiterate that the point (and half the entertainment) is to have heated debate, watch people wind eachother up with interesting takes etc. Everyone wins.

    What do I know, perhaps that's only the point for me...

    My suggestion (what does a forty something retired investment banker / psychotherapist know) is for everyone who hits 'report' to stop, log off, and immediately kick their own ass.
     
    Oreet Cha! and Throwback like this.
  12. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    9,813
    12,775
    Mar 24, 2019
    Yes appreciate that just saying a word to the wise from the mods would be very helpful and lead to less bans
     
    Camaris likes this.
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,773
    47,619
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'm not trying to say that though: what i'm sayng is that you're not on "the internet". You're in a private space that is accesable to the public. Same as a bar is a private space. Smae as coffee shop is a private space. You still see bars with the "we reserve the right to refuse service" in the UK. Well that happens here too. From the rules thread in the general forum:

    "Forum rules and guidelines are not up for debate. Posting on our boards is a privilege, not a right. Anyone arguing with a Moderator against disciplinary measures will be removed from the forum. If you disagree, or want clarification as to why a particular topic, post or individual was removed, you must e-mail us...We reserve the right to delete any message for any or no reason whatsoever."

    What i'm trying to get across here is that you can't do what you like in a theatre; you don't have to shout "fire". You can start yapping about subject x and be asked to leave. It's a privately owned space. "We reserve the right to delete any message for any reason."

    Now sometimes people get upset when they read this stuff for the first time, so let me just say: this is not going to get wildly wild. I am not talking, at this time, about the draconian enforcement of crazy new rules. I'll be guided by the forum, that is what this thread is for. But if the poll stays the same some freedoms will be impinged for a supposed increase in quality. And then we'll see.

    This forum is huge. There are thousands of posts every day. If nobody reported anything, we'd need double the number of mods we have, at least. We need more people to report stuff, not less.

    But the concentration coming out of British has been odd, yes.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,773
    47,619
    Mar 21, 2007
    I reject what you have said though. And i've explained why elsewhere. Briefly: you can't get banned for being pro- or anti- anything. That just won't happen. You MUST infringe the rules to receive a ban. So to take your analogy further - it's like another meber of the public going up to the bouncer and saying to the bouncer: that person over there is talking quietly with his friend and looking at the paper, throw him out. And the bouncer saying: no.

    So, you're wrong.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2023
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,773
    47,619
    Mar 21, 2007
    That's the end now of discussion about moderator conduct. All other posts about moderator conduct will be deleted. If you want to have a matter relating to moderator conduct addressed, please follow the guidelines in the rules thread in General, which explain how to progress a moderation issue.

    This thread is specifically about British forum and the way forwards with that. Share any suggestions you have, and please vote.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.