George Foreman (First Career) Vs Oleksandr Usyk?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Apr 27, 2023.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,156
    49,386
    Apr 27, 2005
    I'm just putting forward facts on what Usyk commonly puts on between weigh in and fight night. I've read before claims of 10-15 pounds and some might even believe more. In this particular facet they would be incorrect.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,766
    51,721
    Mar 21, 2007
    Or correct, depending upon what he worked off, what time he was weighed and what he did after he was weighed. If he was weighed at 6pm, ate, slept, drank a lot for his fight at ten before a standard warm up for a 10pm fight, he absolutely could have been on the ring at 212. If he played handball, didn’t eat a thing, drank only water during an extended warm up he would have come in below 205.

    A lot of the meaning also depends upon the day before.

    Fortunately none of this really matters, because we know the weight range Usyk wants to fight at unfettered because he’s done so. It’s 215 to 230 ish.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  3. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    Agreed.

    However, it does matter when one is fixated on weight as the anchor for size comparisons between two boxers (in this case, Usyk and Foreman) which, of course, is tricky because that could mean Eric Esch was as big if not bigger than Nikola Valuev.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2023
    JohnThomas1, swagdelfadeel and Pugguy like this.
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,766
    51,721
    Mar 21, 2007
    Right, and that's starting to get what i'm driving at.

    When a conversation turns to size and the differences are .5 inches and 6lbs (at HW) you know the conversation has gone wildly wrong. The spread of Usyk's weight (or Foreman's for that matter - people are claiming he "dried out" - before the weigh in? After? Did he hydrate? Did he dry out further? Did he work out? Did he sleep? When was he weighed?) is wider than 6lbs even if he was weighed at 7pm for 9pm, probably. A man can also be literally half an inch shorter (almost!) measured for height evening versu morning, especially if he's spent a lot of it on his feet, running like Dempsey did, shadow-fighting like Hatton did, versus meditating liked Duran sometimes did or sleeping like Lewis did.

    Don't worry about it is the point. If they're within the same weight range we know that and that should be enough. If they are around the same height you know what you know about their jabs.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  5. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    This is all true. The details, from bout-to-bout don't matter.

    But, while that might be the case, it doesn't mean there is not a difference in size between Usyk and Foreman, or that the difference (were one to ever be universally perceived) is not meaningful.

    Your mention of 'their jabs' reminds me that what is more important perhaps is looking at how they actually throw their respective jabs; that this might indicate to me how any such advantage might be pressed or, conversely, negated.

    Details like that interest me.

    However, I would be looking at these types of detail through a lens which sees Foreman as having a, not massive, but significant advantage in size.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,766
    51,721
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think that if two guys are about an inch between them and within 10lbs of each other at HW, the notion of a bigger fighter is not sensible. That's the case here. In fact, if I take my favoured version of both fighters at HW, Usyk weighs in the heavier.

    Foreman was 218 for Frazier in 1, Usyk was 220 for AJ 2. If Usyk is listed by Boxrec as being the same height as Foreman, the same reach as Foreman, is slightly heavier than Foreman but I'm supposed to believe that Foreman is bigger, not having it. Yes, there could be height disparities and weight disparities, but they could work for both fighters - or neither. I don't think it's sensible, so agree to disagree.

    I would add though that many people, supposedly including Foreman, thought that Foreman would have a size advantage against Muhammad Ali. That was not the case. Foreman weighed in 4lbs heaviwer but seemed at times to be the smaller man in the ring. Ali even appeared to be stronger at points which dumfounded people.

    Foreman and Liston seem consistently to be viewed as oversized by the forum and beyond, it is strange.
     
    Pat M and BCS8 like this.
  7. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,874
    11,856
    Dec 17, 2018
    2 fighters can be very similar in height, reach and weighed about the same at points in their career, yet one is considerably naturally bigger/heavier than the other. E.g. James Toney and David Tua are within inch in height and Toney's career heaviest is heavier than Tua's career lightest weight. Yet there's no doubt in my mind Tua is naturally the bigger/heavier and stronger man and that he would have never been able to make 175lbs, let alone 160lbs.

    That's obviously an exaggerated example to demonstrate a concept, though personally I do consider Foreman as comfortably naturally bigger/heavier and stronger than Usyk. No problem if you don't, I have no dog in the Foreman vs Usyk fight, and am not trying to make a point any wider than how I consider their relative size.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2023
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,766
    51,721
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I don't doubt that, but Usyk looks absolutely naturally at the weight, moves absolutely naturally at the weight, has demonstrated an engine absolutely exceptional at the weight. Based purely upon what you see, Foreman exhibits symptoms of fighting at an unnatural weight in a way that Usyk absolutely does not at 220lbs.

    What makes Foreman naturally bigger than Usyk if he is the same size as him? What advantages does being naturally bigger provide when the two fighters in question weigh the same, look absolutely superb as fighters at the weight, look like prime athletes at the weight, have scored the most meainingful wins of their careers while weighing in at these identified weights (Usyk being slightly the heavier)?

    I don't like the way that "and stronger" has snuck in here. These are two different things. This may help explain thugh why people always seem to think Foreman is bigger than he actually is though, they may be think about how imposing he is rather than how much bigger he is.
     
    Pat M and BCS8 like this.
  9. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,363
    87,278
    Aug 21, 2012
    Foreman has always had the aura of a superman here on Classic. While I don't deny that he was an exceptionally powerful individual, I think he also benefitted from having a noticably smaller-sized average opponent array against which he could shine and look impressive against. Usyk is a medium-to-small heavyweight these days. He'd have been 'large' sized in Foreman's day. I think that maybe another thing that makes Foreman seem larger is that he appears to have unusually wide shoulders. That looks imposing and may actually increase punching power.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,766
    51,721
    Mar 21, 2007
    He definitely has his haters too (like all the heavies) and it's definitely not just this forum. Liston and Foreman both project this menace which seems to enhance their size in some people's eyes, IMO.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,363
    87,278
    Aug 21, 2012
    I note the height there as 6'3
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,766
    51,721
    Mar 21, 2007
    On the heights: if i'm forced to come down firmly on heights I favour celebrityheights.com. Heights are their business, and they try to do it via comparitive photographs of known individuals posing with the person they are trying to ID (often the site owner). They have Foreman as 191.5 and Usyk as 189.2. 1.3cm difference. I'm happy to take that as a working difference which would have a range of one inch to .3cm by my way of thinking. I'm happy to dismiss this as meaingless beyond styles.

    Styles show that Usyk fights taller, if anyone cares.
     
  13. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,874
    11,856
    Dec 17, 2018
    I'd guess Usyk's natural fighting weight at 205-210lbs. Around or just under the lower end of that range at the age Foreman was when he fought Frazier and around or just over the higher end now. I therfore agree that 220lbs isn't a significantly unnaturally inflated weight for him and i agree that his stamina at this weight is insanely good.

    Typical advantages a naturally bigger/heavier fighter would hold over another fighter of the same height who weighed the same, would be strength, power and punch resistance. Or at least the balance would be more favourable than it would if they had the same natural fighting weights.

    Again, I'm not arguing Foreman over Usyk, I'm certainly not saying I think Foreman would win because I think he's naturally the bigger/heavier of the 2. I've no idea who would win in a time machine prime for prime fantasy fight. I picked AJ over Usyk first time round, if I can't call fights from boxers in the same era correctly....

    All im saying is I think Foreman is naturally bigger/heavier than Usyk.
     
    JohnThomas1 and Pugguy like this.
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,766
    51,721
    Mar 21, 2007
    OK, some stuff about this position.

    Let's say that you think Usyk's best demonstration of skill and athletic prowess is against Gassiev where he would have been in this weight range. Huck was also very impressive. He nearly knocked out Anthony Joshua when he was the world's number two ranked heavy. Do you think this was easier or more difficult than what he did against Gassiev or Huck? Do you think shortfalls you have dedected in this fight compared to the Gassiev fight might be about the additional difficulties in fighting one of the most difficult combat athletes to beat (in literal terms) on planet earth? AJ would murder Huck, bury him - he is far and away a more difficult, dangerous challenge that Usyk met and he looked exceptional. Do you think any of the small differences you have dedected (that I missed) in these performances might be explained by the much more extreme danger AJ presented to him as a virtual threat? Or do you think it is all about his weight range?

    Secondly, if Usyk is better at 210 than 220, for what reason do you think that Usyk and his medical and training team made such a dramatic error in sending him in at the wrong weight?

    For the record, I think Usyk's best performance was at 220lbs. Nullifying virtual threats is, IMO, the toughest skill in boxing and it's rare to see such an extraordinary display of it especially one that rellied so much upon gas tank at a weight you are contesting was slightly unnatural for him.

    It was weightmaking. Usyk had to make a weight, he had to take off water in the final week (8lbs of it). That is what sent him ot the ring at 210. Left entirely to his own devices he did 215 and then 220. All available real-world evidence points towards this being his natural weight.
     
  15. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    Sure, agree to disagree but would part with these final counters:

    - To recap and as a rule of thumb (and as it applies to athletes who have reached their natural athletic peak), I would say a smaller man, who then puts weight onto his frame, is not necessarily bigger than he was - he's just heavier.

    - Boxers who spend an amateur career in itself competing in IBA run tournaments, predominantly at Heavyweight (201lbs) until they are 25 years old, have essentially matured into a 200lb fighter and are unlikely to be undergoing severe weight-cutting daily to make that limit.

    - The longer term view of their respective careers, from where they started to where they ended up/are currently, indicates Foreman is the naturally bigger man. Usyk is a late-comer to a weight Foreman started out at when he was a kid amateur.

    - Didn't the Foreman/Ali Weigh-in take place some days before the fight itself? [I might have this wrong and I'm prepared to be corrected by anyone who knows the answer to this.]

    - Foreman did have a size advantage against Ali - but, not only did Ali negate this advantage, he also practically turned it into his own advantage. However, he didn't do so without penalty and he certainly didn't beat Foreman with strength, despite appearances to some.

    - I would wager that, if Foreman and Usyk were both transported together in the form of their respective 27-year-old selves to be fitted for identical style suits, Foreman's would be worth much more in cloth, with him measuring bigger in every department. Individually, the differences would not be by much, but the whole is far greater than the sum of its parts.