You can be so ******ed at times. I actually use to like which makes me think I should myself examined.
Oh really? Can you explain to me why all the top pro boxers and pundits are saying that Loma was robbed? Are they all crying like girls? I said that Haney was the better boxer and beat Kambosos so not sure what you are talking about there? Ah no you tried dumping on Sparks win saying it shouldn't have been a DQ so nice try with the impartial act again. Also you tried to claim that Fury was one of your fave fighters but now you are admitting to rooting for Wilder? Can't remember what lies you told again? I couldn't imagine being as sad as you rejoicing in a corrupt victory and talking like you are some hard man who is built different lol you are such a soy boy.
Quit crying hoe. I wanted to see the fight continue I don't like to see DQs dummy I said let the fight finish and that spark was going to win anyway. I also gave spark his props after the fighting saying he showed up and showed out but like the soft hoe you're you got mad at me for saying he put on a show but that wasn't enough praise for your crazy ass. I'm fan of both wilder and fury and said no excuses like i said before tank-garcia. I picked fury to win the first fight and wilder the second. You won't find a post of me making an excuse about gloves or any of that nonsense I said wilder needed to shut up and stop making excuses admit he lost to the better man and move on. You're full of **** I dare you to find one post of me making an excuse for wilder. I'm consistent. You on here lying again. I do remember you on here crying after the first Haney-kambosos fight making excuses about holding. Your problem is you're too emotionally invested in fighters you like the fight was no robbery it was close people crying robbery are fools. This was not a 9-3 fight loma and they gave Haney the decision it was 7-5 either way or a draw deal with it and move on and please stop crying.
Here we go ho ***** ho I'm a tough guy blah blah blah. The only thing I said about Haney was that he was a lot bigger than George. LOL you used to say you admired my passion for fighters from my country now you say too emotionally invested because you can't admit that Haney escaped with his belts like a thief in the night. Nobody likes DQ's but if somebody blatantly breaks the rules with a professional foul what is the ref supposed to do? I don't give a damn what fighters you praise I call you our for being phony and pretending to be impartial when it is obvious you are as bias as that idiot Olu. You can check my history I was a big Mayweather fan a big Ward fan but I just had enough of the BS I never used to like GGG as his resume was to thin for the praise he got years ago but he soundly beat Canelo and was screwed and that's when I couldn't cop the US bias anymore so I am genuine in my passion for this game I couldn't continue to support the corruption like you do you probably can't even admit that GGG Canelo 1 was a robbery.
I was told by overzealous loma fans that he was the most skilled boxer in boxing history. If that's the case he should've schooled Haney 10-2 or shut him out after all Haney wasn't any good that's all I heard before the fight by those fans. Loma should've schooled Haney like pbf schooled canelo who was older than loma when he schooled canelo I might add. That way if they had given it to Haney you could really say the fight was a robbery and there was no case for a Haney win but that didn't happen. Instead it was a close fight and no robbery.
Pointless. The fight as it is remains a profound albeit bitter testament to what the sport has become. It will age well for Lomachenko: he had a lot of amazing highlights in this bout, and he made his point. I feel a little bit of pity for Devin. The moment he cast aside the criticism of him being a e-mail champion, this happens. Damned if you do, damned if you don't because there are two hungry and incredibly dangerous southpaws out there with access to excellent case study on how to snap his head back repeatedly. Depending on how Taylor performs against Lopez, it might be better to move to 140 where he is more comfortable and can feast on easier opposition than the talent packed 135.
I was told that Lomachenko is an old, war-torn featherweight that will get bodied and tossed around by Haney. Mayweather v Alvarez was a different fight, with Mayweather actually having an inch or so of reach advantage, and installed rehydration clause. Lomachenko was giving up 6 or so inches and as far as I remember they moved the weight-in so that Devin had 36 hours to rehydrate.
See what you are doing now is showing your true colors. You always saw Loma as a threat to your hero Mayweather that's what it always comes back to with you. You love the unbeaten record because it allows you to use your favorite catch phrase No Excuses. Loma moved up 2 weight classes in his career naturally a lot smaller than Haney and still out muscled him there was no catch weight or rehydration clause but of coarse you leave that out. Floyd's win over Canelo was great there is no denying that but Floyd did not have the deck stacked against him like Loma did. You know deep down that Loma deserved the win but you will never admit it. I admit that Floyd was a great fighter but why are you using it to deflect again?
I'm pointing out the fact that his overzealous fans said he was the most skilled boxer in history. Well the most skilled boxer in history doesn't go life and death with the likes of Haney. Don't get mad at me for stating facts. Loma has never been a threat to pbf lmfao, he moved up 2 pbf moved up 4. I will and have admitted the fight could've have gone either way but you won't admit that the fight wasn't a robbery. Why? Because you're too emotionally invested and like to cry and make excuses.
Loma was supposed to be the most skilled boxer in history though? Atleast that's what I was told by people like you. Lastly Haney isn't better than canelo he wasn't better than the canelo pbf fought. Pbf showed you how to prevent from being robbed he left no doubt in a passing of the torch type of fight and damn near shut canelo out, all while being older than Loma and in his 5th weight class against a better fighter. All that other stuff is just excuses and I'm tired of hearing them. Go cry with midnight.
He could well be the most skilled boxer in history but that doesn't necessarily make him the best boxer in history. What facts are you stating exactly? What does this even have to do with Floyd apart from the man love you have for him? No matter what you say the fight was not close enough to even consider Haney winning the cards were as bad as 114-114 in Floyd Canelo. The only reason Haney survied was to do with his size it had nothing to do with Loma's skillset.