Corbett vs Foreman. 1893, 45 rounds

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Marcus_Italicus, May 27, 2023.


Result

  1. Corbett Ko

    6 vote(s)
    12.2%
  2. Foreman Ko

    43 vote(s)
    87.8%
  3. Corbett by decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Foreman by decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Marcus_Italicus

    Marcus_Italicus New Member Full Member

    63
    62
    Oct 13, 2019
    James Corbett vs. George Foreman, first version.
    Year 1893, rules, gloves, ring of the time. 45 rounds.
    Foreman has two bombs and an iron skull. He is a little slow though and after a few rounds he loses energy.
    Corbett is fast and mobile, with good defense and capable of running for very long distances. However, he is lighter, with little power and, when he is hit full on, he goes down.
    Foreman lost to Ali and Young (outfighter), Corbett lost to Jeffries and Sharkey (punchers).
    Who wins and why?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,685
    51,513
    Mar 21, 2007
    My best guess is that Foreman would gain control of the fight with his jab and knock Corbett out once that was established.
     
  3. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,486
    29,039
    Jun 26, 2009
    If it goes past 42 rounds, I like Corbett’s chances.
     
  4. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,261
    2,477
    Mar 26, 2005
    With Foreman's stamina problems? Don't think so! Corbett went 61 rounds with the great Peter Jackson...Foreman was gassed against Jimmy Young back in 1977.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2024
  5. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,369
    12,776
    Sep 21, 2017
  6. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,750
    3,184
    Mar 31, 2021
    Ali and Young are a million times more skilled than Corbett. Not to mention stronger too.
    Foreman decapitates Corbett.
     
  7. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,750
    3,184
    Mar 31, 2021
    WTF man ?!? Do you honestly believe Corbett is gonna last more than 30 seconds ?!?? :risas3::risas3::risas3:
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,062
    49,143
    Apr 27, 2005
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,838
    52,999
    Feb 11, 2005
    Yes, Jeffries wouldn't last as long as Corbett. Both are seeing the black lights in under three rounds.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,838
    52,999
    Feb 11, 2005
    Jeffries would get pulverized trying to clinch Foreman. It would hasten his demise.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,838
    52,999
    Feb 11, 2005
    Jeffries, with his ridiculous, wide open crouch, would be lit up long before the first clinch.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,838
    52,999
    Feb 11, 2005
    I would put everything I own on him getting Jeffries out of these within two. And he would hurt him in the first 30 seconds.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,838
    52,999
    Feb 11, 2005
    Jack Johnson threw Jeffries around like a red headed step child. Sure, Jim's reflexes and boxing skills (such as they ever were) were diminished, but not his supposed strength. He sucked. I haven't seen any filmed evidence of him being even a rudimentarily sound or effective grappler. Jeffries, at his very ceiling, fits in with the 5 guys Foreman swept in Toronto.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,838
    52,999
    Feb 11, 2005
    I call them like I see them.
     
  15. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,266
    10,018
    Dec 18, 2022
    Corbett did have immense success in his first fight with Jeffries, but I think Foreman corners him and knocks him out.