Holyfield (1990 s) or Wlad (2000s)?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jun 4, 2023.


  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,078
    40,034
    Jan 8, 2017
    Whom do you rate the higher?
    Holyfield from the 1990 s?
    Wladimir Klitscko 2000 - 2010??
     
  2. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    8,723
    9,051
    Nov 3, 2021
    Emanuel Steward's Wlad (Chris Byrd fight and later) wins. That's how long it took Emmanuel Steward to build a defensive machine that doesn't take many risks but wins. Clean or dirty. Not even peak Holjfield (Bowe 2) could knock out Wlad, who was not knocked out until the last fight of his career.
    Pre Emanuel Steward's Wlad could lose Brewster/Sanders style.
    Wlad wins on points.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2023
    Fergy likes this.
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,051
    86,899
    Aug 21, 2012
    Klitschko obviously. He basically dominated a decade. Now as to who was better to watch and more exciting, well, Holy easily.
     
    Greg Price99 and Fergy like this.
  4. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s banned Full Member

    19,739
    21,757
    Sep 22, 2021
    Only a fluke let's Holyfield beat Wlad.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,051
    86,899
    Aug 21, 2012
    If we're talking H2H then I agree. I don't think Holy has the durability to go the Brewster / Puritty route and he doesn't have the firepower and speed of Sanders. He's gonna have to box Wlad and then it becomes a jab n grab contest. Only one winner here.
     
    Journeyman92 and Fergy like this.
  6. Stiches Yarn

    Stiches Yarn Active Member Full Member

    1,219
    1,927
    Jan 2, 2021
    Holyfield from the 1990's for sure.
    To my best knowledge, i've never seen a top 10 heavyweights list where Wlad is ranked higher.
    I mean evander was the undisputed champion of the division at one point and fought 5 hall of famers, beating four of them whereas wladimir didn't manage to hold all the belts at the same time and didn't fight any hall of famers during that time.

    Of course, it's not just the hall of famers, you also should take a look at the other top ranked contenders that they fought, but even then, i think the ones holyfield beat were probably better and more talented.

    Both of them were great fighters, but one of them hit his prime in a much bette era.
     
    rl2, Man_Machine and Fergy like this.
  7. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    Easy.

    Holyfield from the ‘90s!

    Wlad beat a bunch a guys that people, other than his hardcore following, already struggle to remember the names of.

    Holyfield fought better.
     
    ikrasevic, Stiches Yarn and rl2 like this.
  8. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,465
    37,580
    Jan 14, 2022
    I think people are selling Holyfield a bit short here, I mean he did push a prime Lewis to brink in their 2nd fight whilst being in his late 30s. And Lewis had similar attributes to Wladimir regarding size.
     
  9. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,051
    86,899
    Aug 21, 2012
    "Wlad didn't fight any hof guys" = "Wlad didn't let anybody become a hof guy"
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.