Razor Ruddock hit harder than George Foreman

Foreman is 5-3 in title fights (one win via robbery).

Fury is 5-0-1 in title fights.

Butterbean has 77 wins in boxing and 24 in kickboxing+mma

 

The guy that one could have asked would be Tommy Morrison. Rip

 

he didn't turn tail and run from Ruddock like he did vs Foreman

 

You are so obsessed with my double post that you forgot to answer the question? The reason I don't accept your answer is that no boxing historian would ever say any of those fighters hit harder. You are just bluffing and everyone knows it.

 

Who punches harder? Who is the one on PEDs? That should clear things up for you.

Edit: who has knock knees and who resembles a 53 year old man that has the muscle definition of a man who's been in a coma for the last decade?

 

Probably Butterbean.

Foreman fought in the minimal testing/max PEDs era known as the 90s, so we really don’t know what he was ingesting.

 

I'm sure Foreman never fought in the 70s? I'm sure you have another excuse ready for that era as well?
Regardless, Fury is using PEDs and is therefore cheating so I don't know how you can throw his hat into the ring like that. It's pathetic. It's like defending Lance armstrong when you know he cheated and won unfairly and then go on online parading his name around and dragging GF through the mudd who did it natural. It's just plain not ethical to hold your particular opinions on the matter

 

They didn’t test in the 70s either, chief.

 

Do you know any list of the strongest punchers that rank butterbean higher than Foreman

 

No common opponents.

 

LMAO that's because doping was basically non existent in boxing in the 70s.

So your argument is that since they didn't test we must assume that Foreman was doping during the 90s?

 

I'm talking by reliable outside observation not an unreliable comparison given by a fighter who faced both competitors. ?

 

There I fixed it for you lol

 

False

 

Bart Gunn