Was Ricky Hatton a good boxer?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by monaim, Jun 18, 2023.


  1. monaim

    monaim Member Full Member

    394
    377
    Dec 4, 2022
    Where was he on the level
     
  2. Sks476

    Sks476 Active Member Full Member

    574
    778
    Mar 25, 2023
    Hatton was a very good "boxer". His style was more of a brawler but his fundamental boxing skills were not too bad. He fought with heart and always came to win.
     
  3. Johnny1987

    Johnny1987 Active Member Full Member

    1,349
    1,814
    Sep 20, 2019
    Ask Timofei’s dad
     
  4. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,764
    May 4, 2012
    He was pretty good.
     
  5. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,884
    Nov 27, 2010
    Hatton in his prime only lost to Mayweather and Pac
     
    rl2, MagicE, cross_trainer and 6 others like this.
  6. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,541
    40,064
    Jan 22, 2015
    He was a good exciting fighter no doubt, thought Collazo beat him in a close fight though.
     
    cross_trainer and Babality like this.
  7. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,375
    8,180
    Nov 2, 2010
    He was a highly aggresive pressure fighter, with great body shots that were very appealing to the eye. He was highly entertaining, and one knew right away it was going to take someone really special to defeat him. He fought like an absalute beast when he fought and dethroned the great Kostya Tszyu for the Ring and Lineal 140 lbs belts. He also had a ridiculous fallowing from England. Eventually in his 44th fight he lost to Floyd at 147lbs by 10 round tko, in a very competitive super fight. After his loss, he won a lopsided decision over the world class Juan Lascano and then beat up Paulie Malignaggi, stopping him in 11 rounds. Something Cotto couldnt even do. Then came the Pacquiao fight. Nobody knew going in,that pacquiao was going to terrorize the welterweight division for the coming years and send Floyd running for the hills. Hatton was Pacquiao's 2nd victim in that streak, the first being Delahoya, and the 3rd being Cotto and so on. The rest is history.
     
  8. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,375
    8,180
    Nov 2, 2010
    Also, he was ranked in the top 10 pfp for several years. Got in at number 5 pfp after defeating Tszyu who was ranked number three at the time. He was one of the big stars of boxing for several years. The Pacquiao fight was devastating to his career and reputation as a tenacious elite pressure fighting brawler. That loss was his only loss at 140lbs. His weight division. He was the man that beat the man. He was a proud leneal 140lb champ, he was the Tszyu conquerer, who stopped Castillo in 4 rounds. His only loss was to the pfp #1 Floyd Mayweather. Pacquiao was a former 112lb champ that kept going up in weight, winning titles at 122lbs, 126lbs, 130lbs where he fought and defeated all the mexican stars. One might have thought that was where Pac was going to peak out, but to everyone's surprise he went up to 135lbs then 147lbs and destroyed Delahoya. The question was, could he go down to 140 lbs and dethrone The proud champ Ricky Hatton? What a superfight this will be. What a shock it was, Rickys tenacious come forward style turn out to be his undoing, agajnst a whirlwind rock fisted southpaw. Pacquiao was ranked #1 pfp before the fight, then proved it against another top 10 pfp fighter in devastating fashion. Now, the first thing you think of when you think of Ricky Hatton is that devastating ko loss. You can't unsee that. It was a big blow to his reputation and one that was very hard for him to swallow and i can see why.
     
  9. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,375
    8,180
    Nov 2, 2010
    He had pretty good power too as you can by his ko % .
     
    Arch Stanton likes this.
  10. Arch Stanton

    Arch Stanton When you have to shoot, shoot!, don't talk...... Full Member

    10,554
    18,647
    Dec 24, 2022
    He wasn't just a good fighter, he was a very good fighter. And a very down to earth likable young bloke too.

    There was no shame in losing to two elite fighters, no discredit at all.

    The only negative I give him for the losses was some excuses and a bit of public blame-gaming post fights.

    No one's perfect.
     
  11. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    420
    Aug 21, 2010
    lost (Senchenko lost was cringe) only to ATG's FMJ and Pacquiao lmao for sure he is good
     
  12. TMLT87

    TMLT87 Active Member Full Member

    1,055
    1,135
    Feb 21, 2021
    Course he was, better than good in fact. Floyd and Pac were ATG level though.
     
    cross_trainer, DJN16 and Furey like this.
  13. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,024
    Mar 6, 2011
    His cv is vastly overrated in fairness. Never actually beat anyone of note. But had a massive support base. He was like Marty Rogan on steroids.
     
    ashishwarrior likes this.
  14. DoubleG95Fanatic

    DoubleG95Fanatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,535
    3,960
    Oct 25, 2021
    Don't really count that loss on his record, he was basically semi-retired at that point anyway and was far beyond the Ricky we all once knew.

    Hatton in terms of actual boxing IQ, ability and skill wasn't spectacular & you'll find many boxers of today who are better, but the strengths he did have he utilised very well.....fast hands, very good power for a 140/147 fighter and pressed/cut off the ring incredibly well.

    I personally believe everyone in the top 5 at 140/147 now beat Hatton in his prime.
     
    cross_trainer and EJDiaZ like this.
  15. The Cryptkeeper

    The Cryptkeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,941
    5,613
    May 9, 2023
    Are you a moron? Serious question.

    He beat all timer Kostya Tszyu for a start.

    Excellent fighter.