Marciano vs Baer

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Maxcassidy86, Jun 21, 2023.


  1. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Marciano was disciplined and dedicated. Baer was not. Baer has a puncher's chance, but that's about it.
     
  2. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,494
    11,942
    Sep 21, 2017
    Who's Rudy?
     
  3. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,927
    12,004
    Jun 30, 2005
    Little-known member of the Marciano family who was a weak, un-athletic toughman competitor. Rudy mostly just absorbed punches with his face.

    For whatever reason, Rudy gets mentioned a lot in threads about his world champion relative, Rocky Marciano, whose only similarity to Rudy Marciano was the last name.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,227
    Mar 22, 2015
    I don’t rate him.
    Simple really.
     
  5. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,494
    11,942
    Sep 21, 2017
    You can't not rate Baer. He was HW champion.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,637
    27,341
    Feb 15, 2006
    There is some logic in that.
     
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,927
    12,004
    Jun 30, 2005
    Perhaps Baer is unrated in the sense that he's simply [UNDEFINED.]

    He just hovers completely outside heavyweight rankings, unknown and unknowable.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,637
    27,341
    Feb 15, 2006
    There is some truth in that as well.

    Baer does not fit the mold of a weak lineal heavyweight champion, but he doesn't fit the mold of a strong lineal heavyweight champion either.

    He was just Baer.
     
  9. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,227
    Mar 22, 2015
    Well I don’t want to appear unkind because I respect all fighters.
    I recognise Max’s charisma and personality I just don’t think he was that good.
    Sure he was tough had a good chin and a big right hand, but that’s about it for me.
    His skill set wasn’t very good and he just didn’t seem to use the physical assets that he had at hand.
    I’m no expert though most on here have probably forgotten more than what I know and maybe there are nuances to his game which I’m simply not seeing.
     
  10. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,099
    9,881
    Dec 17, 2018
    I don't think there are subtleties to Baer's skillset that you're not seeing.

    It's just being big and strong (relative to the era), an explosive and huge puncher, allied with having a decent chin, can take you far. Especially at HW. Which is why Max went relatively far.

    There are fighters who did not make my top 20 at HW that I rate above Baer, but if I stretched my list to 30, I suspect he would be in it, and if he wasn't, at the very worst he'd be knocking on the door.
     
    swagdelfadeel and Cecil like this.
  11. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,169
    20,740
    Jul 30, 2014
    His biggest limitations imo were his form (he practically fell halfway to the floor when throwing uppercuts) and zero use of the jab.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  12. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,099
    9,881
    Dec 17, 2018
    Yes, he was technically limited and scores poorly in the mentality (discipline, focus and drive) stakes.

    He was a physical specimen, though.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.