British Heavy’s losses the last 20 odd years

Lewis lost to ramahn n McCall Danny Williams lost to many to put in one message Chisora lost to fury thrice whyte twice klichko Haye Parker twice Helenius Pulev kabayel Usyk maybe one more price lost to Chisora kuzmin erkan Povetkin hammer Thompson twice joshua lost to wee Ruiz Usyk twice whyte lost to Joshua soon to be twice fury Povetkin audley Harrison he lost to sprott Haye wilder guin Williams rogie price hughie fury he’s lost to Povetkin Pulev ribbed against Parker Tyson fury he’s lost to nobody undefeated what do these losses say about these boxers what can we read into there losses furys undefeated the only one quite something to sit down to think about put Lewis in as he was active 20 odd year ago losses a bit before that

 

Sorry Jim had to give up half way through found it difficult to follow

 

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here Jim, but if it’s that Tyson fury is the best of the bunch because he’s undefeated I don’t think you’re going to convince anyone on here.

Fury would have taken a loss if he stayed active and fought all comers, 3/4 fights a year he’d have been beat by now, not because he’s rubbish, but because the odds dictate it.

If the likes of Whyte have a 20% chance against Fury and he fought 20 fighters of Whyte’s calibre he would’ve picked up a loss to two. Losses are a byproduct of activity against the elite in the division.

Losses in the heavyweight division do not define a fighter.

 

Ill put it on separate lines later for each boxer easier to read then

 

But other folk havent faught all comers and still lost has joshua and Whyte been in against all lol im no trying to say anything your putting words in my mouth what does losses say look Lewis lost against crap so has joshua what does there lossess say about them

 

It would be easier to read if you stopped putting it on.

 

I’m not comparing Fury with anyone else, all I’m saying is that if he was more active and he fought more high level contenders odds are he would have taken a loss. What have AJ, Whyte and Lewis got to do with it?

 

Why is there a desperate need for Fury fans to make it seem like he is the best to ever lace them up?

Furys CV just doesn't stack up to the greats, it's that simple. It's better than Brixton Bomber will admit but it's not an all time great record.

 

Don’t bother

 

this is clearly an alt, he's spelled fought perfectly in the past, now faught. I've been banned for being mean to this person but come on, this is ludicrous. It's meant to be a boxing forum. I'll pop him on ignore but it's idiotic that he's on here.

 

What is it you're asking? Their losses say that they were beaten. It also shows very good boxers can be beaten by not so good opposition.

To be fair, autocorrect is inconsistent and it depends how someone's spelling a word. If you're unsure and have a habit of trying to get it right while typing fast and not being thorough then it can come out in different ways.

 

perhaps,but it's also the constant casual homophobia that is accepted that goads me. It's not woke to expect people to not deride people using homophobic language.

 

I'm a Christian mate, so I'd better respectfully eject myself from this sort of chat - just here for the boxing.

 

Methodist myself. You are entirely allowed your views mate. Have a good evening, and like you said, let's get back to the boxing.

DO NOT EVER FOLLOW MY BOXING BETTING TIPS

 

Yea great post. You can tell Fury is desperate not to lose his 0. It’s always interesting to see how fighters deal with a loss.