vladimir klichkos quality of wins as thin as cigarette paper

Was Valeuv also not trying to hurt the living legend Larry Donald?

https://www.eyeonthering.com/boxing/nikolay-valuev-vs-larry-donald

 

I don't actually agree that Holyfield should be a point ahead. I was more acknowledging that some argue that he won the fight. Personally, I suspect Valuev's team were also looking to make as much quick money as possible. His next fight being against a 29 year old, David Haye, it was also his last fight. However, Haye was very cautious with how he engaged in that fight, and for good reason. There seemed to be a big difference with how fast Valuev was moving trying to cut off the ring against Haye, and he was throwing with some real purpose and intensity. Against Holyfield, it looked like he was throwing a lot of arm punches and pulling others when Holyfield was wide open.

 

Spot ****ing on

 

Wlads resume is suspect and he should have been DQd from his two best wins.

However Lewis’ wins you listed aren’t particular impressive : shot to bits Tyson, 37 yo Holyfield, fat out of shape Tua….

 

I'm not watching that bore fest again, though I don't recall it being all that egregious.

There are only 5 fan cards on that website, and three comments. One comment is claiming German fans booed, another saying it wasn't a robbery, and one who didn't actually watch it.

I wonder how Russians scored it.

 

Worst title fight
With least amount of punches thrown
What did you watch jim
It was all herky jerky fainting and posturing
****ing terrible fight

 

I know his cross is second only to Wilder's as to power. As to his arsenal, footwork, stamina, IQ ring, chin and defence (improved with E. Steward as trainer) its enough you watch well his videos comparing them with Wilder's ones (for example) to realize that when he was at the top he could have beaten most of fighters of today..excluded Usyk.. probably.

PS: many say he faced Joshua and Fury from old. I share.

 

They’re not the best 5 wins for Lennox, Evander and Mike.

 

I was never a fan of Wlad’s. But the issue here, is that you don’t really want a debate.

 

Prime he still beats everybody in this era.

 

He is reasonable - no point of debating with a non-sense poster that you are.

 

Wlad doesn't have the strongest resume no, but he didn't fight in the strongest era. Were there really any other guys that he could've fought apart from his own brother?

He fought who was available. Not a great resume no, but his great dominance over the division makes up for it. Something like 10 years as champ with like 19 straight title defences. That makes for an ATG and a top 10 heavyweight of all time