Assessing Larry Holmes's all time heavyweight standing

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Jul 21, 2023.


  1. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,189
    7,923
    Sep 19, 2021
    You do raise an interesting point here. There were other similarly talented guys during that time, but they all did stupid **** that harmed them. Got out of shape, substance abuse issues, personal life drama, female drama, etc. By virtue of being a stable "boring" guy who showed up in shape and avoided bad habits, he had the opportunity to rise above the others. They were out snorting coke with strippers, he was playing with his kids and then going to the gym.

    It isn't really a knock on him though that others chose to squander their talent. Like Thomas. Probably a greater talent than Holmes, but couldn't stay clean.

    If I could point out something about Holmes in his favor -- a late start robbed him of his entire physical prime. We're comparing what a 30 year old Holmes could do to what a 23 year old Ali could do. How fast was Ali at age 30? The fact that Holmes achieved what he did with a late start bumps him up a bit. His first big fight -- against Shavers -- that's the experience level he should have been at around age 22 or so, not age 29.
     
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2023
    Blofeld and Vic The Gambler like this.
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,642
    47,345
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's interesting that you run into this type of thing only for Heavies. I don't think you get this weird certitude about completely subjective matters when you're discussing bantamweights. It just doesn't really happen. But ok.

    Jack Johnson.

    Dismissing Jack Johnson as "nowhere near" Larry Holmes is reprehensible. JJ is below Holmes on my list, but get it right, he's the only man who, h2h aside, would have reasonable criteria to be #1 on the list. You could make a case for him being above Louis and Ali (excruciatingly difficult for Holmes) that is reasonable.

    This would be circumstances. The circumstances of Jack Johnson's greatness are so in excess of anything Holmes faced as to be an absolute mockery of a comparison. I understand Larry Holmes sometimes had to fight in places that didn't have air conditioning! Jack Johnson had to fight in rings that barely held together. I bet Larry Holmes had access to only good steroids and rather primitive scientific support. Jack Johnson had to substitute beer for water on occasion because the water he had access to was so questionable - and was often advised to dry out right before a fight. And it wasn't "The same for everyone." Johnson was a fifth-class citizen. He got robbed, spotted, asked to take dives, was bullied, denied the right to fight, sent to prison for fighting, harassed by the law, moved on for vagrancy, all while Larry, at the same time in his career - while Holmes was picking up tips from the GOAT as a paid sparring partner, Johnson was scrambling for tips from seasoned professionals who had knocked him out and with whom he now shared a prison cell.

    Jack Johnson fought almost as many fights to secure his title shot as Larry had to fight in his entire career. Worth repeating: Johnson fought more than sixty fights just to get a shot at the title. That is how much more storied he was than Larry Holmes. He boxed an entire career before he came to the championship that was arguably better than what Holmes did in his career. I'll back that statement up now.

    Before he came to the title, Johnson went 2-0 with Sam Mcvey. He went 5-1-1 with Joe Jeannette. And he went 1-0 with a green Langford. All these guys are in my top thirty-five all time at heavy. That means, that before Johnson even fought for the title, he had gone 8-1-1 with all-time top 30 heavyweight types and the loss was a DQ. Let's look at Larry Holmes record versus my top thirty at heavyweight for his whole career (he fought so little in comparison to Johnson, it is the only fair way to do it): 2-2. Pretty awful for a top ten type being honest. What's that, you don't want to include his beatings at the hands of Holyfield and Tyson becasue he was old? OK - but we have to remove the corpse of Ali from the list too. So it's 1-0. Ken Norton :lol:

    Larry Holmes came to the ring listening to his favourite rawking tune. Johnson had to listen to the band play "All Coons Look Alike To Me". Holmes prepared for the title shot by feasting on pro losers and journeymen. Johnson battled black dynamite arrayed specifically to make him getting a title shot impossible and beat them all (and professional losers and dynamite). Jack Johnson was frequently threatened with murder in states where laying his hand on a white man could get him lynched, then battered the best white contenders anyway. "They weren't very good." But Johnson beat them in front of men who had killed blacks before and would again; in front of crowds who had seen blacks lynched and would again. I'll go so far as to say that there are no heavyweight champions who i am sure could pull this off other than Johnson. Nobody else proved to me, definitively, that they had that internal fortitude. If i had to name another, i'd name Ali, if I had to name a third, i'd name Jeffries, but after that it gets foggy. incredible circumstances to do elite fighting in, almost unthinkable. Sometimes there was no blackface in the entire crowd. Sometimes there was literally one. Sometimes famous figures from the era, respected men with whom Johnson could not legally dine would run the ring screaming racial insults at him. Johnson beat them all anyway. Johnson lost his title to a super-heavyweight who wasn't very good, something that happens all the time with belts. Holmes lost his title to an actual former light-heavyweight world champion, something incredibly rare.

    "Nowhere near."

    Take your "nowhere near". Write it down. Role that piece of paper into a cylinder. Put the cylinder of paper in a tube. Stick the tube up your ass.
     
  3. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,189
    7,923
    Sep 19, 2021
    Because Holmes was a 50something grandpa by that time? Or? Galento was a far better fighter than Butterbean. Galento played up his image as a drunk who trained on beer and ate everything in sight, but his record shows he took boxing a lot more seriously than to actually do that. Most of Galento's image was just that, an image, I think.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  4. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,189
    7,923
    Sep 19, 2021
    This is, I believe, the best post I have ever read on this forum.
     
    McGrain and Greg Price99 like this.
  5. Philly161

    Philly161 "Fundamentals are the crutch of the talentless" banned Full Member

    1,669
    2,268
    Oct 25, 2020
    Damn dude I really just started reading unforgivable blackness and you went and spoiled half the book with this post.

    All joking aside, this post makes a good point I hadnt really considered. Begs further questions about what it means to be "great."
     
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2023
    Salty Dog, McGrain and Greg Price99 like this.
  6. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,625
    11,457
    Mar 23, 2019
    #3. Quite possibly the greatest heavyweight jab ever (stiff competition from Liston, I know). I personally think Larry had even better timing with the jab than Liston and Ali (and that's saying a lot). His accuracy, especially in his prime, was sensational to put it mildly.

    Didn't have anywhere near the competition level of, say, 1969 to 1976 (though I daresay peak Weaver and Cooney would have been dangerous in any era, same with the Witherspoon who stepped in the ring with him). He did seem to be both a Kingmaker and destroyer...look how many of the fighters he faced were either ex or future champs. He even stopped Bonecrusher when he was on an obvious decline, something Iron Mike couldn't do during his peak years.

    Of course, besides 1991 to 1997 there might NEVER had been stiffer competition than the era mentioned above. Certainly Wlad and Vitalij had it worse...shoot, I think it's pretty bereft today, personally.

    Defended his title 20 times, something only Ali and Louis can compare to (I think Wlad might be up there, forgive me for not remembering).

    I think H2H a 1979 to 1982 Holmes beats Foreman, Iron Mike, Thomas, Dokes, Coetzee, Tucker, even prime Lewis (that would be tough), Fury, Joshua, Bowe Wilder, Marciano, Wlad, Vitali, Patterson, and all the champs pre-Louis. I've intentionally left out a bunch from the past 40 years who would have been relatively easy in Larry's prime.
     
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2023
  7. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,625
    11,457
    Mar 23, 2019
    To me Coetzee would have been an obvious loser, he lost handily to both Tate and Weaver. Imo beating Dokes (who was never really that good a fighter to begin with and won the title on a bad ref call) didn't count for too much.
     
    Greg Price99 and J.edwards_ like this.
  8. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,699
    3,529
    Jul 10, 2005
    Only boxing history fans would bring up Holmes Norton, where Lewis vs VK was going on in the media for months before Lewis finally step down. Holyfield vs Bowe is still considered one of the greatest rivals in the heavyweights, it may not be up there with Ali Fraizer, but it gets media attention today. With out us bringing up Holme vs Norton, how often does it gets mentioned?
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,642
    47,345
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: no. But thanks.
     
    Rubber Glove Sandwich likes this.
  10. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,710
    5,799
    Aug 27, 2020
    I'm kind of having a hard time believing you actually rank Holmes above Johnson after this. I would really like to hear your reasoning for that.
     
  11. ThatOne

    ThatOne Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,905
    8,186
    Jan 13, 2022
    Ali felt the sting of racism but nothing like the sting felt by Jack Johnson. Plus a lot with the emphasis on a lot of white people adored Ali. Not sure many white people adored Jack Johnson. What a set of onions on that guy.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,642
    47,345
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well i'm feeling Johnsonat the moment fair to say. I think HW is uniquely pliant and weird. Because there's so much danger of KO and so much money around guys get handled a certain way. If you have the title you are better paid not making the best fights. That wasn't true of other divisions until about 2000. There are just some weird circumstances surrounding heavy that means that the ratings are far less concrete than in all the other divisions but people, because reasons, want it to be MORE concrete and will argue the point to death. It's weird and unfortunate.

    The point is - last time I did a list I had Holmes above Johnson. But that doesn't mean I think Holmes is above Johnson, or even worse, like Seamus, that it is inarguable.

    There is nothing between Holmes and Johnsons same as there is nothing between Johnson and Wills or Jeffries and Holyfield. Heavyweights are wound tight. But at least we got the top two. At least those are in good nick.
     
  13. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,710
    5,799
    Aug 27, 2020
    People's need for definitiveness for Heavies makes sense, albeit it is unfortunate as you say. They are the apex predators in the sport, most folks almost certainly have their personal Heavyweight hero because they can use them as fantasy projections for one reason or another. It all results in a "My hero is better than your hero" thing, most of the time it has to do with the era they grew up in. I'm pretty sure you remember how hurt Burt Bienstock was by the things they said about his own heroes here. It happens in lower weights too obviously, but certainly to a lesser degree.

    But I digress, Heavies and fighters as a whole are too weird to rank definitively. You can have guys like Liston and Frazier, there's basically nothing between them. One gave Muhammad Ali an experience close to death, the other made him look like the finest athlete who ever lived. Fights between two actual all time greats in their prime are very rare ocassions, which is what really seperates Ali and Louis from the rest. It's almost comical how ahead they are of the rest. There were 15 world Champions before Joe Louis if we start from Sullivan, Louis beat 5 of them.:lol: That's almost a span of half a century.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and McGrain like this.
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,862
    16,789
    Apr 3, 2012
    Holmes was boxing in the ams in his early twenties but wasn't anything special. You can't just turn him into a superstar like Savon.
     
  15. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,924
    35,739
    Jul 4, 2014
    It is a knock against him, because some of those fights were on the table (Page was a mandatory that he refused to take), and others he made no attempt to get. It most definitely is a knock against him that he beat almost none of the best of his generation.

    As for the late start, a lot of boxing "age" is really the miles, and he had a good run. In any event, I am not going to argue about his hypothetical talent or what he might have accomplished. History is not done by what-ifs.

    His most notable fights are, however you slice it, ShaversX2, Norton, Berbick, Witherspoon, Cooney and Mercer, and that makes him at the lower end of the top ten for me, and that is ONLY because of the respect that my fellow fans show him.