Sure, but seems like a one off. Heavyweights have historically been the cash cows and post Mayweather/Pacquiao world it seems to be trending that way again.
It wasn't. His second biggest purse absolutely dwarfed Tyson's biggest purse too. And his third. The idea that an American heavyweight is required to make the massive purses ended with Tyson. And, frankly, Joshua's biggest purse compare wonderfully well to any any HW ever not named Tyson. He's probably the best paid all time never to have fought, or to have been, Mike Tyson. You've got it the wrong way round. It is Tyson who was the one-off.
I mean to say that the Floyd/Pac era was a one off. Heavyweights have almost always been the cash cow of the sport.
Since Tyson retired, it's been Oscar, then Floyd, then Canelo and AJ. Every one of them has absolutely massive purses to hand directly comparable and usually bigger than every heavyweight not to have fought Mike Tyson or have been Mike Tyson. You have it wrong. Mike Tyson was the one off. Ali's biggest purse was about a third of AJ's biggest ever purse adjusting for inflation. Holmes got a little more. None of the American heavyweights are comparable to Canelo, Floyd, Oscar and AJ apart from Mike Tyson and dance partenrs who dwarfs them all. But he's a one off
My mom used to always say, they make our men like they used to. Americans done got soft. Look at the heavyweights in the 90's when they were trying to kill each other compared to those of today. We will never these types of fights anymore. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Ok, so who is going recapture the American interest in the sport? Notice how all those guys followed eras that featured dominant American HWs. When DLH and Mayweather were making their way and winning their first titles boxing was far more popular in America. Why because Tyson put boxing on the map. Let me ask you this? Who is the next tiny man that is going to all of sudden have everybody buying their fights? Let's say no American HW comes onto the scene anytime soon. Are people actually going to care about Gervonta Davis, Inoue or Devin Haney? They don't give a ****.
I don't know, or care. The notion that "boxing needs..." is wrong. American boxing needs, maybe, yeah. But if the next AJ (bigger than any American HW since Tyson, bigger than any HW before Tyson, allowing for the fact that purses for fighting Tyson were as big or bigger) is from China, that makes no difference to me. It would be better, in fact, for me, less very late nights. If Chang is the next HW superstar, great. If it's a Brit, even better. If it's a Kuwaiti, brilliant. If it's not a heavyweight, i prefer that personally, but it doesn't make a huge difference. There are new players in the game and whether or not the next hugely popular fighter is from America makes absolutely no difference to most of us. That said, if it is an American heavyweight, what fun.
Ali definitely had the most mainstream coverage and eyes on him. He didn't get paid as much, but that's more "down to the times". Promoters paid fighters less, people made less and the cost to see fights was less, with the early form of PPV (closed-circuit television) being quite rare. Generally, in the past, in the USA only HWs could capture true mainstream attention. Sullivan, Johnson, Dempsey, Louis, Ali, Tyson. Before Mayweather I don't think any non-HW had ever became a household name in the US.
Terrible excuse. The nfl is not taking any heavyweight from boxing. Dudes just don’t want to get hit in the head for a living. Just because someone is big doesn’t automatically mean they will be good at something.
Too many “champions”. The whole point of being champion is because you are the best. With 4 to 5 per division, it’s diluted. It really means nothing today. Too many promoters as well. And the weird thing is, we have fans of promoters now. There’s no accountability for crappy judging either. That turns off a lot of people. When you have 70 year olds judging, it’s bad.
I think that in America there were probably more eyes on Ali than Tyson, yeah. Worldwide? I'm not sure that's true. And I know it's not true now, Tyson's overtaken him at some point. Tyson was huge in Chechnya in a way that Ali wasn't and US tv was broadcast to China for the first time right before Mike turned pro. He is big in India. I don't think you can really exaggerate how enormous Tyson was, although yeah, arguing about who was more famous out of Ali at their respective peaks is pretty ridiculous, they were both utterly enormous. It's certainly true that before Tyson, heavies were the biggest thing in boxing. Post-Tyson, this is not true, partly because nobody could live up, but partly because Oscar landed in the wake of Leonard.
I thought Mike Tyson was more popular too. But think about America. Tyson is more popular in Russia, but if you tell someone in Russia, "Ali is better than Tyson" no one cares. If you tell someone in America, "Tyson is better than Ali." There is a good chance they will have never seen a professional boxing match in their life, but they will still argue to you that Ali is better than Tyson. Because random people think "Oh, wasn't Tyson kind of a hype job compared to Ali?" Random people who know literally nothing else about boxing know that in the US. Your average doctor in the US knows that, and so does your average hobo. He's really popular.
The US will not always be so economically dominant. It's changing as I'm typing this. The US is declining (in more ways than one) relative to emerging economies in Asia, etc. The US $ is slowly losing it's dominance on the world scene. You're trying to hold on to a world that is slipping away.