Wasn't Ugas a decent win for Spence

It was a great win, the manner of the win to be more accurate.

Who else could have put a beat down on the negative defensive world champion Ugas and force a stoppage?

Pacquiao couldn't put a dent on Ugas and was lucky to win 4 rounds, albeit Pac was a tad past his best.

 

"a tad"

 

A tad? Dude was shot at 42. He didnt have the usual bounce to his step and got picked apart by the jab. Prime pac would have killed him.
A tad past his best was when he fought bradley the first time. He was already over the hill by the time he beat Thurman and turned back the clock.

 

Yep, plus he hadn't fought in over 2 years, so he was way past his best plus rusty as well.

 

Same way he killed Clottey? It's the manner of the victory.

Pacquiao at 147 was a points victory fighter, he wasn't chopping down or knocking his opponents out.

Who else could have chopped down a negative defensive Ugas the way Spence did?

 

Ugas wont ever do fk all.. he beat an ancient legend .. so what? You think anyone cares about that win? What you should be more concerned about is why Spence is spitting his mouth guard out in recent fights???

 

The Ugas victory over Pacquiao wasn't special, the Spence victory over Ugas was.

It's the manner of the victory is what truly matters.

Just as the manner of the Crawford over Spence victory matters.

The unique manner of the victory are anomalies, similar to the unification of organisms in a Petri dish.

 

Ugas was a very solid win.

Dont think anyone says otherwise.

 

It’s decent, but that’s it. Nothing to really write home about.

 

Yes, but it was the last in a string of excellent wins. Spence was looked at as the real deal period, then got completely dismantled. That why the boxing world is in shock right now. Crawford shocked the world!

 

Decent win but nothing great. His win over Pac is so overrated.

 

Lol excellent. Nah. It’s a padded record.

 

It was a good win.