You are moving the goalposts with your pov. He wasn't anyone of note back then. Did any of you follow the sport 10 years ago or so? It is nothing but casuals on here now.
When you take challenges on as a boxer ,you are bound to lose at some point Happens to the best of them Would more than likely happen to Fury if he had the sacks to do so too
So you would know that Crawford wasn't the top dog and that JMM and Broner were. Thanks for your input.
Jesus, a view which doesn't hold someone who clearly lost to McMuffin, and constantly gets either put down or struggles with the small guys, in the highest regard! More balanced views and users like this please.
But he's fat! How can he lose to someone who doesn't have a six pack!? Zzz. Lots of heavies aren't adonises. Look at Fury. There's no need to be shredded, it causes stamina issues.
Fully aware Just never saw any mention of Crawford being the top dog until this post Its irrelevant anyhow, i think you overreacted in calling him a nobody
Hold up You called Crawford a nobody,imo he was not ever a nobody How have i moved the goalposts? Quite frankly i don't even know what you are attempting to pull me up on?
I'd save your energy arguing with him, he's clearly desperate for attention. I've popped him on ignore. Sorted.
As was Ricky that night too and although I was never that impressed by Burns, he was a tough pro. Boxing is such a surprising sport as a few years later Beltran got badly beaten up and dropped against Pedraza when losing that brown crappy belt. Pedraza was never a boxer who I thought would out tough him, even though he was clearly the better boxer, but that night he bashed him up too. Styles sure do make fights.
AT THAT TIME Crawford was unknown. He was a nobody as Broner and JMM were the 1 & 2 of that divison at that time.