What do you mean no ? obviously Crawford's top 2 wins at Welterweight are Spence, Porter. But then who else on his Welterweight resume is rated higher than Ortiz or Berto ? Kell Brook was shot after eye injury vs Golovkin, then you have Khan who was at the end of his career and one fight away from being semi retired. And then you have fighters like Avanesyan, Horn, Kavaliauskas, who i certainly wouldn't rate above Ortiz or Berto. PS i corrected my earlier post i meant top 3 instead of top 2.
A forum that despises Mayweather has him way above at 147. Stop overrating Bud Crawford. Jeff Horn - garbage & dodgy decision vs Pac Benavidez Jr - garbage (best win is Rojas who has lost 6 of his last 9) Khan - shot Mean Machine - got dropped, this is his best win at 147 Brook - shot Porter - didn’t train properly, gave up two years earlier when Spence beat him Avenysan - was stopped 4 years prior by mean machine Spence - more shot than khan & brook at the time crawford fought them. Took flying lessons in a ferrari
Still better than pretty much anyone on Crawford's Welterweight resume outside of Spence and it was 16 months not 18 months. Your talking about that but not mentioning Spence hadn't fought in over a year when he fought Crawford ? 14 months which is barely any difference to 16 months for Mosley, or the fact that Spence had only fought 3 times in almost 3 years. Or what about Shawn Porter who hadn't fought in 15 months when he fought Crawford ?