Pros/Former pros take on if Dubois shot was legal.

This content is protected

Dmitry Salita calling it a low-blow.

 

This content is protected

 

Its not even a 'blip on the radar'. Idiots can carry on all they like and display their own ignorance for the world to see. Usyk cleaned up his opponent and onto the next one.

 

this time it will be incumbent upon the big dosser (did i say that right?) to go 50/50. he'll duck. quack quack. XD

 

How do you think that will work out for them? Camp Usyk are not armchair Generals. They do this **** for a living. I suspect that they are aware of Usyk's weaknesses (if that is actually the case) and the opportunity that weakness presents. Could become interesting.

 

Pros/former pros who say that was not a low blow are just jealous of Usyk's success. He is guilty for conquering cruiserweight and heavyweight divisions and for being from the East.

 

The reality is it was obviously close and some refs would have let it go and some wouldn't, particularly live without replays and still shots.
In that sense Usyk probably was fortunate, whether or not it was legal.

But the reality is that Dubious is hitting fabric, so he should expect it to be called low even if it's not the lowest of the low. If you want your big uppercut to be called legal, then make sure it's not so low that it can be called low by a ref. You can't cry about it being called low when you are shooting it at best right on the border of what is deemed acceptable. And you can see Dubious was swinging low at other times, hitting hips and so on, which means he's aiming low on purpose because he's actually taller than Usyk.

The other thing is that nobody knows if it was a fight ending shot, so stop acting like it was. Usyk wouldn't have reacted like that if it was deemed legal, he would try to cover his hurt rather then sell it, which he might have done possibly. And almost certainly he gets up and tries to survive, which he likely could do with evasion and grappling, given his massive experience. So it wasn't like he got KO'd cold by a shot called an illegal rabbit punch that turned out to be on the side of the head.

In the end there are other controversial things in fights that 'fair play' complainers in this case don't care about, whether it's mayweather suckerpunching Ortiz, or Ward's headbutting and low blows, or Wlad headbutting Fury, or Wilder getting helped between rounds in the Ortiz fight. There are also plenty of KD's called slips and slips called KD's and everything else, often that decided fights.

Dubious had a massive youth and size advantage here and likely a big PED one too and couldn't get the job done. The reason is he's another UK hype job and failed brand who also turned out to be a quitter. A two-time quitter already at this young age. Another mouthy thug fighter dressed up by the UK media, who can't handle it when it comes back and got KO'd by a jab, just like his LHW equivalent in Yarde. Hilarious!

 

There is plenty of shots of his naval below tne belt line in the fight, including when he took the shot and when he fell, and when he got back up

 

" [..] actually appearing above his trunks when he breaths [..]"

It was hidden right beneath the belt which covered all the areas considered illegal; the fact that it showed up at times is a clear indicator that his trunks weren't high (hence why the referee did not instruct the belt blows as being a fair play as he would in other cases.)

 

Fury will tax that fuzzy navel easily with his long reach…. Close to Zero chance of getting countered.
& I really don’t care for Fury.

 

Maybe that’s why the Gypsy Queen is reluctant to face him or any other pro boxer not named Wilder
I do hope your right, but that reach advantage is rediculous.