Usyk Beltline & Low Blow Controversy/Dubois Was Robbed! Dump Thread.

No, I hear you. Saw it was twitter. If it sounds like I was saying it was your twitter , I was not. Was just trying to point out the twitter post was actually wrong. We are both in agreement that he clearly hit bello the navel!

 

If it's the one I'm thinking of (looks like there's a sudden rise in the level of the top of Usyks shorts), what's the explanation if it's not photoshopped?

 

I watched the video the pic was cropped from. In the video, it looks like the top of the protector.

 

That pic does not show his navel when the punch lands. Explain my bias exactly!! What's biased in saying the shot is inconclusive. Once again since you seem so hard of hearing... I am not saying it was low I'm not saying it's legal, I'm saying its inconclusive and therefore you give the benefit of the doubt to the puncher.

You have disproved nothing as there is nothing to disprove.

Now explain what bias you think I have or what agenda I'm working, cos my page is public unlike yours you can go through and read every thread and post I have made on here to easily prove any bias you talk about unlike yourself

 

That shot was lower than Bidens approval ratings.

 

It's this type of blindness that gets Trump into the Whitehouse. You're a seriously disillusioned bunch of fools, bred to believe lies, unable to be logical.

This is why Fury is still considered champ. Why Canelo did eat tainted meat. Why Kovalev's balls were fair game for big head son of headbutt. Why Loma dismantled Haney and gets the loss.

 

Yeah i'm done with you, you are beyond biased. I already prove my point. Plenty of people say it was totally illegal. No reason for me to even read your comment and waste my time. You are just beyond biased.
A straight up picture 1 second before the shot with his navel above the upper belt line, and he is saying when the punch land. Only a complete bias people will argue that Usyk somehow in the span of 1-2 second will somehow magically will put his trunks up.

BTW:
Next time open your eyes, this exactly at the time of the shot:

This content is protected

You going to cry more now ?

This content is protected

 

And plenty of people say it was legal.
Again what bias?? Explain the bias is saying that the shot is inconclusive? Who's side doer that favour?!?! I asked you 4 times now to explain the bias you keep claiming but you never explain it.

As I said all my posts are public feel free to quote anything or any threads that back up your lies of me being biased. Like I said it would be interesting to see your post history I'm sure it isn't full of pro usyk posts..... But you won't make it public, you don't want me to prove you wrong.

The facts are the video from one angle shows the punch as appearing to be legal and another angle appearing in to show it's lower. Therefore it's inconclusive. You do know what inconclusive means right??!! Going by your past posts it doeant appear you do!

 

No it's not inconclusive, cause there is a clear angle from the front point and you can see everything that happen, the whole punch, it's trajectory, and where it's land.
The other angle is an angle where you cannot see a s****, you cannot see Usyk front, you cannot see where exactly the punch is landed.
Zero controversy.
Case closed.

 

It's low, there is no real argument. They fact that any angle shows it landing that low, proves it was low.

I didn't think it was low in the live feed, but it was, and was a good call from the ref.

 

There is a clear angle that shows that the punch lands above the hip bone, hence why it's inconclusive. Now explain my bias that you keep saying I have?

 

There is an argument hence why we are having one. There is angles showing the punch land above the top of the hip

 

Why exactly should the puncher get the benefit of the doubt?

 

Cos I think the one initiating the action should get it. Much like other sports if there is a grey area and a call that cant be made you tend to favour the one pushing the action.

 

Interesting that you don’t have any consideration for fighter safety whatsoever as long as somebody is “pushing the action”