Carl Frampton says he wouldnt **** on Mcguigans now if they were on fire

My error, what I mean is .

You can slate Frampton and the gangster advisor , of course you can.
It does not give Mcguigan a free pass for what he did , you can slate him also.

 

Frampton has spoken on it at his book launch. Says Kinahan’s involvement in crime ‘doesn’t concern him’. The book was written by a former MTK chief officer who was a defendant with Kinahan in a civil court case.

Sometimes it’s better to remain silent. Slating the McGuigan’s then praising MTK and saying you’re not bothered what Kinahan does (because he gave him a load of money basically) isn’t a good look.

 

Forget it , so you can only slate 1 person what suits your narrative.
Both are scumbags , that's how simplistic it is but you obviously have an axe to grind

 

Does anyone know what Sunny Edwards issue with the McGugans is?

I may be me missing obvious but I can’t see no link.

 

Kinahan puppet. McGuigan’s the only people in boxing to really slate Kinahan so it’s probably got the little rat on the defensive.

 

Where have I said that? I’m saying he can’t moan that the McGuigan’s are bad for boxing when he’s involved with someone who launders drug money through the sport.

What’s so hard to understand?

 

OK thanks Shane

 

Not the poster you're replying to, but you've touched on something that frustrates me about a lot of sport discussion. "Whataboutery".

Frampton: McGuigans are bad for boxing.
Critic: What about you supporting MTK?

Barry Hearn: It was disgraceful when Frank Warren promoted Haye vs Chisora in London using the Luxembourg federation.
Frank Warren: What about when you hosted Julian Jackson vs Herol Graham in Spain, because Jackson's eye wouldn't pass BBBofC medical checks?

The problem with this is that valid points get swept under the carpet.

In this case, the critic and Frank Warren may have a point. Frampton may also be guilty of being a whopping hypocrite. But it doesn't in any way oppose the topic of discussion.

Based on his experience, he's totally justified in making his statement and should be listened to.

Separately, he should be taken to task by the media for his MTK links.

 

I get what you’re saying mate. I’m a big fan of Frampton, just think he’s taking a stance of ‘I don’t care what someone does as long as it lines my pockets’.

 

Unfriendly phrased it alot better than me .

 

Same for Okolie

 

I'm excited for Frampton's book even more so after hearing him today talking about how expenses for his camps were just given as lump sums and never broken down until he got his accountant to get the figures as part of the court case and found out that, out of his Santa Cruz purse, he'd paid for the Mcguigan's to live it up in New York for 10 days straight after the fight including shopping trips and sunbeds!

 

Reading the list of expenses the mcguigan lot charged to Frampton is jaw dropping. They was bleeding him dry.

I don't know why any boxer would sign with them after reading that.

 

anyone whos pals with a drug lord is a twat in my eyes but thats my humble view

 

Behave ya tart