Better fighter: Hamed or Inoue ?

LMMFAO

 

Very profound statement obviously i am out of my depth conversing with this highly educated gentleman

 

LMMFAO

 

Naz could have easily fought at 118 and 122 and stay undefeated.

But you know he tested himself in with a red hot Barrera who was in form not a 39 year old but Barrera prime version etc.Got found out.It happens.

Naz was a tiny FW by todays standards.He was a big puncher.Barrera was skilled and elite considered one of the best Mexico had ever produced.

Naz could have smashed Filos, ricans and UK’ians like Buttler and Mcdonalds.No he wasn’t content with that.He went after one of the 3 prince of Mexican boxin,Barrera.The others being Marquez and Morales.Real ones!

Naz could have do what Inoue doin fighting nobodies at 118 and 122 be rated as one of the greats.But he knew that he needed a bigger fish to add to his legacy.You say he shouldn’t be in same breath as Inoue.Tell me anywhere in Nonoya resume that can be in same breath as Barrera or Marquez?

 

Hamed incredibly overrated. It's not even a conversation.

 

Oh dear another one with no idea

 

Could be one of that crazy Noaya fan alts.Dude has 3 alts and counting.

Thinks beating Jason Boloney, James Mcdonalds and Pauline Buttler is incredible.Amazing achievement.

 

Inoue should have a joke career and duck fights like Casimero the Pedophile.



And Casimero the Pedophile's best performance isn't even as good as Inoue's "worst" performance. Don't forget an unknown trash collector from Ghana beat the hell out of Casimero last time out.

 

100%

 

Hamed was all over the place none of the fighters he beat were elite.

 

Hamed was always extremely dangerous with that concussive power & unorthodox angles, but I like Inoue in this one.

Barrera, however, is a completely different story. I like MAB over Naoya by UD or late TKO.

Why are people pointing out Barrera's loss to Pac, to back Inoue? Don't you guys realize MAB was at the end of the road and nowhere near his best?

 

Not true Barrera was P4P number 3 when Pacquiao beat him certainly not past his best he was coming off some his best performances.

 

Oh Mark you really are so out of touch its unbelievable.You even stated Naz would lose to Josh Warrington which is right up there with the most ridiculous statements ever made on here.Therefore i do not anything you say seriously

 

He was clearly past his best if you watch how much he had slipped by then, it was something like his 70th fight and he'd been in some incredible wars. Yes, he was still good enough to be competitive with most, which is a testament to just how great he was in his prime.