Why claim the fight was “ locked in” when it’s clearly not? Why turn down 2 WBC title fights for a fight that wasn’t going to happen?
Both fighters agreed terms but no contracts were sent by the Saudis... it was as good as locked in. I am 100% confident that we will see Joshua vs Wilder in 2024. Both fighters want it and I'm sure someone will step up with a site deal to pay both fighters their worth.
Lol the wba afraid they take an L in the courts Back the **** up and let's right our wrong that we let slide for years You ****ed your own org Just like the wbc Theses orgs scared of making up the rules as they go along The courts just wouldn't accept their skull****ery
'100% confident' is that really you Eddie? As for paying both fighters their worth? How much do you think AJ deserves to fight Wilder? Surely he must have been making DAZN a loss since he's been fighting for them. No big gates and I'm guessing very little extra DAZN subscriptions to offset against his massive purses for fighting bums. AJ is no longer the big money making machine he was before Usyk.
It's not locked in so that isn't as good as locked in. The Saudis won't pay the money for this fight. Given that no promoter has been able to put this fight on in 8 years how can you be 100% sure this will happen?
Wilder-Joshua was locked in, except for the part where it wasn't locked in and AJ laboured with some bum taxi driver instead.