FFS Steve... Dude literally said NOTHING of the sort. Just that he doesn't have the comp available to reach that status.
You have to actually beat those fighters to reach that status, not just fight them. What if Inoue is actually fortunate to not have to fight those guys? Hmm? We don't really know.
Completely agree. He might not have the right opposition to truly prove it. Lots of greats were the same though.
Will the Manny>>>Inoue contrarians at least concede to Inoue>>>Floyd, especially by the same stage of their careers? That shouldn't be a contentious take on here or any other forum. I think it would be one of those extremely rare instances where everyone would all be in agreement across the board, right chaps?
Hatton was hit w check left hooks by far lesser fighters and was badly hurt in Lazcano fight. And Lazcano was no Floyd or Manny
PAC is basically a modern era fighter though, he's an anomaly and also had huge longevity at the top. The low output, fight twice a year at most era was well under way in PACs prime.
An anomaly is an understatement with Pac, truly a once in a life time Fighter hence the avalanche of daily detractors.
Yes true but has got even worse in the last decade. The top fighters from 2000s racked up way more fights on average than fighters today.
Inoue is much better than Pac. Pac is old, walking on his heals. And when he was younger he was a wild swarmer. Inoue is smooth and accurate.