Fury is lucky to be top 100 with this paper thin resume. EDIT: Since this thread did not say anything about strictly HW ranking ATG, going with boxing as a whole
A few people play those games here it seems, they backtrack, edit a previous post, a new logic emerges. It's a dangerous thought process.
The best part is Frank Warren's reference to the voluble Eddie Hearn's "Vagina Monologues." This content is protected
We are not on about prime Holmes though. The version of Holmes that fought Mike Tyson doesn’t beat Tyson Fury any day of the week.
So we only compare Fury to the washed up version of fighters do we? Is that why the gobblers rate him so highly?
No of course not, but there was a reference to the Holmes version that fought Tyson. I think most rational people would pick Tyson Fury over the version of Larry Holmes that fought Mike Tyson.
A bit of an exaggeration. Wallin made Tyson look bad at points, but one cut, not matter how split open, doesn't qualify as going life and death. It could have been justifiably stopped on that cut but Tyson won that fight fairly handily.