I think he might have felt that Byrd could have made him look bad. Pretty much the same motive Fury gave for ducking Usyk - beating such a small HW wouldn't get him much credit while losing, or even not winning convincingly, would be really bad for his legacy. Byrd was of course much less accomplished than Usyk and the stakes were much lower, but the principle behind might well have been the same. If Byrd had held three titles and a huge offer had been on the table, I don't think for a second that Lewis would have walked away like Fury did earlier this year, though.
I can’t believe that I’m even writing this, but for once I agree with you. He definitely ducked Byrd. He tried to rematch Tyson too, which would have been truly horrific.
I think Moorer when he had the titles would of been a commercial challenge as it would of been a fight for the undisputed titles. But Moorer never even wanted the fight with Lewis. After he beat Holyfield he was asked if he wanted to unify against Lewis and Moorer simply said no and that he felt he didn't feel he needed to fight Lewis. So he cherry picked Foreman which I guess he saw as equally lucrative but also a far less risky fight and then we saw boxing history being made when that backfired horribly for Moorer.
Nah, don't be so humble. Being put on your arse by pillow fisted CWs with 29% and 43% KO percentage whom you also outweigh by some 40 lbs is no mean feat, yet the Lord of Lard managed to achieve it twice in the space of just 18 months. No other HW champion has even come close to something so embarrassing like this, ever. This, and the "having more kids than title fights" thing will surely be remembered for a long long time. Wear them like a badge of honour, mate.
Boxing isn't about not getting dropped uber alles otherwise McCall would be the best ever, rather than a journeyman/fringe contender/one-hit wonder with 14 losses. Ali and Holmes were dropped by fighters weighing in the 180's but this may have been beneficial to them in various ways in terms of winning fights in the long-run. It doesn't apply though when you get sparked with one punch, twice. Or when you quit against a 25/1 underdog. "having more kids than title fights" Weird to place sterility on a pedestal or to suggest that it has anything to do with one's status as a boxer but ok.
Factually Lewis did duck Byrd (and never fought a southpaw above Greg Gorrell level), whereas Fury is scheduled to fight Usyk in February.
"spouting revisionist BS" I've linked a load of articles from the time. It was seen as a duck by many in the boxing media and the public. It's also ironic because the pro-Lewis narrative is heavily reversionistic. He was strongly criticised at the time for his weak chin, his lack of heart and his "thin resume", not considered a "true great" when he hung up the gloves. This was the case in British and American media. "Lewis was the draw he could make good money fighting anybody, he didn't need Byrd at all, it added nothing to his resume at the time" He was willing to accept a far smaller fee to fight plodding orthodox slugger and J. Ruiz-victim Kirk Johnson. Byrd had beaten Tua, a few other Lewis mutual opponents and Vitali, who was ranked lower than Byrd, added less to the resume at the time. None of Lewis's excuses add up. Lewis on the Kirk Johnson purse: "I don't care about money anymore". "Why did King not wait for the purse bids" King wanting to make an in-house fight for the IBF is unrelated to Lewis not wanting to fight Byrd and ducking him. He would have refused King's derisory payoff if he wanted to fight Byrd. But as Lewis's laywer and Lewis himself said, he never did. This is all in the main piece and it's boring having to type/copy it out again. "Byrd at best would of lost a wide decision" Conjecture. Lewis never fought a southpaw above Greg Gorrell level, a fight which left more questions than answers. Stylistically Byrd may have caused Lewis all sorts of problems or beaten him but we'll never know because Lewis vacated his belt for a derisory fee rather than fight him. Another one of your quotes about Lewis's duck of Byrd: "if he had taken the fight at the time he would of been criticised for it." So Lewis would have been criticised more for fighting his mandatory Byrd than for vacating and ducking Byrd and turning up at the Byrd-Holyfield fight to commentate at ringside instead. The only way Lewis would have been criticised more for fighting Byrd is if he'd struggled/lost, which they clearly thought was a significant risk. And irrelevant stuff like this: "Sander's simply was never on Lewis' level and really only could of been seen as a challenger to Lewis again after he beat Wlad which happened 3 months prior to Lewis fighting Vitali" McCall and Rahman weren't as good as Lewis either, they still KO'd him. There were at least two quality southpaws who wanted to fight Lewis during his time as a titlist/champion and Lewis didn't fight either of them, fighting the likes of Botha and looking to fight Kirk Johnson instead. It will always be a stylistic blank space (at best) on his record.
Yeah, good he finally found his balls. If everyone sucked off his nuts like you do and made excuses for his earlier duck he'd be happy to never face Usyk, though.
Usyk wasn't available to fight until 2023 at the earliest (claiming an injury in December 2022) and the Saudi's weren't hosting until December at the earliest. One could argue that Usyk was de-facto ducking the heavyweight division until he fought Chisora in 2020. Fury fighting Usyk has nothing to do with ratty goobers online, don't give yourself too much credit. Usyk's been on the radar as a potential opponent since 2019 at the latest.
He ducked the **** out of him in Fenruary/March, you know that even though you just can't own up to it, Miniq. And, yes, his ego was clearly rattled by not only commentator but also other fighters calling it the duck it was, as I had hoped it would be.. The hissy fit he had on Froch was one clear sign of that. He is fragile outside the ring.
This is just your opinion. The facts are: Lewis ducked Byrd, Fury is scheduled to fight Usyk in February in Saudi. If Fury pulls out and retires, then in my eyes it's a duck. "He is fragile outside the ring." As a boxer it's probably better to be mentally fragile/unstable outside the ring than mentally fragile in it.
Best to be like Lewis - neither. And sure, he should catch some flak for not facing Byrd. Would have been an interesting fight. By that time he had taken the smaller cut for undisputed against Holy and had been ducked by both Bowe and Tyson. Fury's antics - "retiring" two times, pricing himself out of a fight with Joshua pre Ruiz and ducking Usyk the first time - has delayed his chance at undisputed with a good number of years, but still good we seem to be there at last. I would have preferred him to go the Lewis route, though. I e being prepared to face everyone until achieving pretty much what he set out to do, then ducking what was just another contender in the big scheme of thing before finishing with a win over one of the two dominant fighters of the coming era.
Lol, what an idiotic take to stay true to yourself. You are ready to literally defend everything and anything about Fury. Quite scary. The point was, my dear cult member chum, that calling yourself the greatest fighter ever while you made more kids than title fights is so absurd is not even funny. Never was the bar so low for greatness where you can apparently be considered not only an ATG but the GOAT with six title fights, half of them fought against the same limited guy. If only Ali, Lewis, Frazier, Tyson, Louis, Holmes, Foreman, Holyfield etc knew they only needed six title fights and three defences. And look at those idiots doing 12, 15, 20, 25 title fights, risking their health and career that many time, going through elite opposition and training camps and all that sparring sessions and the resulting wear and tear all this takes. Rest assured, Fury will be but a footnote in boxing history. He is not even the most famous or best paid fighter now, he and his laughable resume will be remembered maybe for comedic value, nothing else. First title defence against a 40-year-old, 12-losses Chisora, getting beat up by a boxing debutant It's very satisfying to watch Fury destroying even that little legacy he ever had, and when he sinks completely like the disgusting fat whale that he is, he will bring you, his sycophants with him too, so the boxing fan community will be finally purged.