Parker Would Always Beat Wilder. Wilder Would Always Beat Joshua

His feet and general agility are imo too slow to be the favorite. They get in a fire fight Wilder is more likely to come out the winner and that's not taking into account more heart

 

You cannot actually be serious, surely?

Even ignoring Pov (because he was shot) the win over Parker is a much more respectable achievement than anything Wilder has on his resume... Chisora's resume is better than Ortiz's too.

Whytes resume is clearly better - it's not really even debatable.

Allow me to redux this to show why it's not a good argument:
"Whytes so hittable that two fighters who were way better than Wilder managed to knock him out"

Just because two much more skilled fighters managed to knock Whyte out doesn't automatically mean that Wilder does....

He'd stand a chance, but you'd have to be brave to bet on it.

And let's not forget, we've literally just seen what happened when Wilder fought someone who was way better than his best win - are we really backing him over someone who was on the same level as the guy that beat him 12-0??

 

I don’t personally believe that the Parker that lost to Whyte for example would be able to beat the Wilder that peaked in Fury 1. Maybe, but not “always”. I think Andy Lee has a lot to do with Parker’s renaissance, and is the man with the plan to beat Wilder. So I wouldn’t be too certain on that historically.

Joshua on the other hand, I always felt would beat Wilder. And the reason is quite simple - Joshua is well tried and tested and has fought many different styles. He can’t beat Usyk - big deal, he’s a generational talent and kudos to Joshua for fighting him twice. But he beat all the rest of them. Wilder - he never really fought anyone, and that was to his detriment because each time he did step up he got a rude awakening.

I have to ride with the guy who has the depth to his resume. It’s easy to say “Wilder takes his head off” - but on what evidence? There just isn’t any. It’s all pie in the sky and feelings based. At least if you favour Joshua you can find bolstering evidence from looking at his resume and the people that he fought.

 

He knocked down OBESE Fury in the 12th anyone could of connected on that version of Fury SMH

 

They should've got him Kownacki

 

All these AJ fans are in denial.

If AJ and Hearn were so confident of winning, why didn't they take the fight on the 23rd and make it a 'super event'? And why not years before that?

Even if people believe Wilder ducked AJ, he had nowhere to go after losing to Fury and it's not believable he wouldn't take the AJ fight then, especially at his age and when Finkel knew they were running out of time. It was the obvious 'cash out' fight.

And to add to that evidence, he still claims to want to fight AJ, while AJ and Hearn show disinterest.

AJ's career is all about 'calculated risk'. Wilder was simply a massive risk due to his RH. AJ could win but he could also get humiliated in round 1-5. They knew that and avoided Wilder like the plague.

 

If you go through my posts you'll find a lot of grammatical errors. I only proofread after I submit, and I only reread my posts about 50% of the time.