As i have said many times compubox is just terrible and hell even biased b.c., that more often than not is beyond inaccurate. Also it could be heavily biased, because of star power, etc. This content is protected As i have said always, GGG schooled Canelo in that fight. This wasn't even close. He destroys him in every single department there is. GGG 1 and GGG 2, as well as Kovalev - Ward is one of the biggest robbery in Boxing. Alongside Lewis - Holyfield 1. Lewis - Holy was just a fixed thing. That fight was not even competitive. At least GGG vs Canelo was competitive, competitive, but not close.
Spoiler alert Golovkon lost this fight while guys like you claimed he'd knock Canelos jaw into space. Funny how reality works.
This was master trick from them actually. They used the "boiling frog" tactic. If You put frog to hot water frog will jump out of the pot. But if You put frog and slowly increase temperature silly poor animal get boiled. They do this with GGG. First fight they decide to robbery Gennady "a little" that's why they give him draw. Draw is always easier to accept for ppl and make fans start thinking that they are on same level. Then in next fight You can go one step forward and ppl will complain less because they are anesthetized with prev. moves. That's was horrible because they destroy great carrer. GGG for sure can achived much more if he will have 2 victory over Alvarez. He would be number 1 in P4P rating and ppl like Smith or even WBO Holder Sanders (last missed Bell) will want fight him because DAZN will pay good money for fight with GGG. Robbery with slick plan. Third fight when GGG was old because Alvarez wait soo long was finish of this plan. But karma catch him and named od this karma is Dimitry Bivol.
GGG Canelo 2 shouldve been a draw but it wasnt a robbery. Maybe a bad decision but for sure NOT a robbery. The 1st fight was a robbery where 8-4 was a very fair and accurate score and 7-5 was splitting hairs...but you really needed to favor Canelo's work in fight 1 to give him 6 rounds. Outta all the times I watched the rematch I think maybe 50% draw, 30% ggg win, 20% canelo win. The 2nd fight is a classic where you can watch and rewatch the fight and arrive at different interpretation each time, especially with commentary muted. And things get really layered and compelling when you take into account the 1st fight and the robbery there...not to mention that it is rare for rematches to look different and the 2 fights were almost like different people.
Don't need AI to tell you that GGG won the 2nd fight 8-4 or 9-3. People got their vision blurred by Canelo coming forward and thought that meant he was winning
Nqh, nqh, nqh. GGG won both fights absolutely clean 9-3 or 8-4 worst case. Did you even look at the AI or just come here to copy pasta. There is no criteria where GGG wasn't infront. There is no human factor here, no bias, straight reljaity.
Ok, bud. Tell me more about how the destructive force of nature beat Canelo "easily" going backwards after complaining about Canelo fighting the 1st fight the same way. Unfortunately GGG fans are always claiming he won every fight and not being honest with themselves. He was I trouble vs both Jacobs and Derevyanchenko and his stans won't admit it. Those fights with Canelo were close, period. What's really wrong with boxing is people crying robbery when it's not warranted. There have been some legit robberies but Canelo GGG 2 was not one. I feel like you could have given the 1st fight to Gennady, and the 2nd one to Canelo. 3rd one isn't even worth talking about.
Jesus, you guys are still complaining about this fight? I had Canelo winning 7 of the first 8 rounds in the 2nd fight, there was no point in scoring after that. Extremely easy fight to score.