GGG vs Canelo 2 AI Punch Count

I'm not trying to convince anyone. I did not watch the AI video but GGG did not outland Canelo by 300 punches in the 2nd fight. It was a close fight. It shouldve been a draw. If a decision had to be given GGG had a better claim to the win.

With all that being said it still wasnt a ROBBERY. A bad decision is not a robbery. The FIRST fight was a ROBBERY. Canelo at most won 4 rounds and if youre being very generous 5 rounds. You would have to be wearing GBP glasses to give Canelo 6 rounds in fight 1.

 

The criteria are:

Effectice aggression
Clean punching
Defense
Ring generalship

GGG was not moving Canelo really at all in 2nd fight and Canelo actually landed the cleaner and flashier punches more than GGG did. Canelo also had superior defense although GGG also had very good defense. Ring generalship was a wash since neither of them budged.

https://www.dazn.com/en-US/news/box...judges-and-referees/zncunu9sov881vkqqvvqlsu67

FWIW I thought fight 2 was a draw and if someone had to win it shouldve been GGG but I could see case for Canelo...mostly based on the story of the fight.

 

I thought this phase of your life was over, I thought one day you grew up and realize Canelo was just too good for GGG. Apparantly not.

By the way, Mundo landed a lot more on Berty than he did on Canelo. Mundo was completely schooled by Canelo 12 rounds to zip. Against Berty, it was far more competitive while it lasted, some gave Mundo several rounds. Against Canelo it was a complete shutout.

 

Golovkin fought in the pocket, his back never hit the wropes.

 

Wow, im glad you weren't a judge, you'd be in the hall of shame with Adelaide Byrde.

 

I wouldn't, because they could rig them as well. All they would have to say is, hey, thats what AI said the score was. What they need is mandatory lie detector tests after the fight. If Byrde passes after the first fight she should be banned for incompetence instead of jail time.

 

So you have one robbery and one bad decision, both going to the same guy. That equals to robberies in my book.

 

True enough. Computers can definitely be manipulated, but I think it would be less maddening than knowing humans keep getting it wrong.

 

I lost faith in computer counting systems after the stolen election. It's an easy cop out. If you say anything they can come back and sue you.The precedent has been set.

 

bro canelo won the 2nd fight 7-5. I agree the first one was a robbery though

 

bro he lost, you can either get over it or cry about it for 5 more years.

 

Jesus, this guys fanbase is completely nuts.

 

Election wasn't stolen. If they have proof, no need to worry about being sued. Fox settled for 750 million instead of going to trial and presenting all their overwhelming proof? Sydney Powell, the presidents attorney, plead guilty instead of presenting her overwhelming proof? No indictments, no names, no emails or texts of conversations about stealing the election or wrong doing has been presented. No how or who after almost 4 years. Not too convincing if you ask me.

Compare all the evidence that has been brought against Hunter Biden or the individuals that attacked the capital on Jan 6. Less evidence has been brought in the election fraud than those 2 cases. The election being stolen is only 2nd in criminality to the assassination of the president, yet no evidence?

 

Actually, when i say recently,i mean I've been saying it wrong for a while. I used to say only 30 ringside reporters had it for GGG, when actually it was 38 for GGG, 15 had it a draw and 2 had it for Canelo. Thats just the facts. All GGG fans have gotten over the robberies, but it's not necessary to be a revisionist historian as to not affend a Canelo fan.

 

Try to giving evidence of a crime against a police officer in a corrupt town and see how that plays out, then times that by a million, thats what you got. There are innocent people that just flew out to that area that never set foot near the Jan 6th event, and the FBI used shock and awe technique's on innocent people to make a point. That being said, lets leave this conversation for the lounge. Sorry i brought it up.