GGG vs Canelo 2 AI Punch Count

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lordlosh, Jan 14, 2024.


  1. bjl12

    bjl12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,843
    2,535
    Sep 26, 2012
    No. Scoring a round is based on those 4 factors not just punches landed. We arent discussing this - youre just wrong.
     
    Ph33rknot and sdot_thadon like this.
  2. sdot_thadon

    sdot_thadon Active Member Full Member

    1,090
    741
    Jun 6, 2009
    Not surprising as it took AI quite a bit of time to even learn how to draw hands properly lol.
     
  3. Ph33rknot

    Ph33rknot Live as if you were to die tomorrow Full Member

    22,727
    22,609
    Mar 5, 2012
    It still can't most of the time
     
    sdot_thadon likes this.
  4. box33

    box33 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    3,441
    Jul 25, 2021
    I just watched it count two punches for Golovkin in the first round that hit Canelos glove when he blocked it hahahaha
     
  5. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    Time stamp?
     
  6. box33

    box33 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    3,441
    Jul 25, 2021
    Watch the first round from when the GGG punches landed goes from 3 to 5, i just paused it there as some other guys posted AI videos before of other fights & they seem to be all over the place, CompuBox counting weak tap jabs in general over hard punches that shake or stun you for a moment is a joke in itself.
     
  7. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    I think you are looking at the wrong stats. You are looking at thrown punches. As it never goes from 3 to 5. There was quite a pause between the 4 and the 5 landed punch for GGG.

    And both punches were 100% clean. I was not sure about the 5 punch, but on a 0.25 speed, it's clear as day, as Canelo head snapped back, and the punch landed on Canelo forehead.
    For anyone wondering, 0.25 speed, second punch that was given as 5 landed can be seen clear on 0.25 speed:
    This content is protected


    Also there is a huge difference in the AI 1 years ago, compare to AI of now.
    And this specific AI system has like 5 fights in total.
    So don't know what you have watched that is inaccurate. This is million times better than the compubox, and the most reliable thing to counting punches.
    It has no bias, so even if it has some error, that error will be evenly distributed to both.
     
    box33 likes this.
  8. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    Also just to confirm something, this ain't my system, i'm not doing any AI work, and was wondering how AI scored the Loma - Haney. And found this one.
     
  9. box33

    box33 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    3,441
    Jul 25, 2021
    I agree with you about it being more efficient than the corrupt CompuBox unless of course it's your choice of fighter that compubox has favored on the given night then all statements are retracted & it's a great & accruate system once more haha.
     
  10. box33

    box33 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    3,441
    Jul 25, 2021
    If these guys post those matches they will be taken off by copy right or youtube in general it always happens, i missed a few good boxing highlights of sparring, etc as they are now nowhere to be found.
     
  11. PunishingJab

    PunishingJab New Member Full Member

    72
    105
    Nov 24, 2023
    The decision was razor thin. No robbery but felt harsh to give it against Golovkin after the first 1. I put it in that Leonard-Hagler Bowe-Holy 2 razor thin category.
     
    bjl12 and Rumsfeld like this.
  12. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    No fight is razor thin, when Fighter A outpunch you in every single category, land 150 more punches, threw 300 more, and literally beats you in every single given category.

    This ain't bias, this is a 100% unbiased system that is doing the scoring. :D
     
  13. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    Compubox is just terrible. 2 people clicking 2 buttons. The error factor is huge, and it's highly inaccurate. And yeah there is always the bias factor with humans doing the count.
     
  14. box33

    box33 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    3,441
    Jul 25, 2021
    Especially if it's the same special group that's assigned to click those buttons, complete BS.