Who his size beats prime two armed Lomachenko?

Now we can never tell for sure whether anyone's claim of being injured is true. However, there are some boxers who are just pathetic and make an excuse for everything (Wilder for example).

You're claiming this is a "minor injury" ie downplaying the fact he had surgery, because you have some clear weird bias against Lomachenko (even though he is one of few fighting at disadvantages all the time):
https://talksport.com/sport/778710/vasyl-lomachenko-video-shoulder-injury-surgery-teofimo-lopez/

Loma stated that he purposefully didn't use his arm for the first half for the fear of fighting the whole fight with arm(and still cleanly outlanded Lopez in round 2 and 6) Loma is a guy who is alway respectful for his opponents, an actual professional athlete who I haven't heard excuses from before. I doubt this was an excuse

 

Well how about you go through rounds 2 and 6 like I did, rather than run and refuse to answer this in the previous thread which I remember you doing by the way. I outlined all the punches landed using normal speed and slow motion to demonstrate what actually lands and the impact. I produced also video evidence of the punches landed, normal speed and slow motion. People in that thread were claiming Lopez punches hitting gloves arms and shoulders were > Loma's clean headpunches. You couldn't make it up, I'm up against 5 or so simpletons in this thread, and yet none of you have produced anything that suggests Lopez should have won those round.

You simply accept your opinion of rounds 2 and 6 being Lopez, despite not realising all those punches you think landed by Lopez (undoubtedly influenced by the **** commentary) in fact did not land.

And I've been through this before, Loma did not land much in rounds 1-6 (yet outlanding Lopez in 2 and 6), but in the rounds Lopez won he landed **** all himself, it must have been single digits in rounds 1, 3, 4, 5 - barely landing clean mainly body/elbow punches.

Yes let's forget that in the rounds Lopez won 1, 3, 4, 5 , he was winning rounds by single digits if that, missing most his punches, and failing to effectively corner Loma off. Whereas those other rounds Loma won , 7, 8 ,9 ,10, 11, Loma was pinging Lopez' head round lmao...

Tell me do you believe Lopez's rounds 1, 3, 4, 5 were more impressive than Loma's 7-11 rounds?

TL: DR - You're an idiot

 

Yes so you admit you didn’t even bother scoring rounds 2 and 6 accurately so why are you blagging on as if Lopez won the fight?

They were a minority but there were many who had Lomachenko winning or drawing:

This content is protected

I believe I had it a draw at the time but at the time I acknowledged there were several very close rounds, hence why I rescored it.

My assessment is that Lomachenko won rounds 2 and 6 and therefore won or at least drew the fight. Many had Lopez winning these, when on closer look he didn’t. What’s your problem with having some attention to detail or accuracy?

If Loma deserved 6-7 rounds based on an accurate assessment of the rounds, he has been robbed. Real time for the average viewer I accept that it’s difficult to see everything that land, hence why we are supposed to have neutral.l biased judges ringside

The fact 1 judge gave Loma 1 round and another gave him only 3 is evidence they were planning to rob Loma no matter what. 1 round…a professional judge gave him one round.

 

Lol sums up your response can’t even finish a sentence

It’s clear you haven’t comprehended my post. Any response will lead to another circular response from you. You can lead a horse to water…

You claim Lopez won based on your inaccurate scoring of the rounds. You simply don’t know what you’re talking about and speaking on emotions.

You don’t score fights for the fighter following an opponent around the ring. Otherwise Mayweather’s lost most his fights.