ESPN: Teófimo Andrés López Rivera vs. Jamaine Ortíz & Keyshawn Davis vs. José Pedraza González RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Feb 8, 2024.


  1. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    9,250
    11,911
    Mar 24, 2019
    Everbody losing their head over this fight because of hatred of Lopez.The reality is it was a rubbish fight but it was close,get over it
     
  2. Badbot

    Badbot I Am An Actual Pro. Full Member

    44,356
    31,987
    Apr 17, 2011
    It´s called effective aggression.
    So it doesn´t matter if a fighter is aggressive or not, unless it´s effective.
    Ring generalship clearly belonged to Ortiz as he ran circles around Lopez with ease, who despite his aggression failed to land anything of significance.

    Ortiz was in full control of the ring. He dictated the pace and landed the cleaner punches.

    But fine, if you want to argue against this... then I don´t know. Give me 6 rounds you thought Lopez clearly won and I will easily disprove one of them.
     
    CST80 and lobk like this.
  3. Badbot

    Badbot I Am An Actual Pro. Full Member

    44,356
    31,987
    Apr 17, 2011
    Only if you don´t know how to score.
    117-112 was criminal.
     
    C.J. likes this.
  4. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,321
    11,767
    Jun 21, 2015
    Lol, of course it is called effective agression. López: very low effective agression. Ortiz: no agression at all. Easy to make the choice.

    Was ortiz' agression more effective than Lopez's? no way, to start with because ortiz's agression didnt even exist at all.

    Ortiz didnt control ****, the only thing ortiz controlled was the marathon that he had to run because he couldnt control ****. Running without throwing even jabs is not controlling anything, actually it means the exact opposite, fighters do that when they cant control the fight for ****, so they avoid it at all cost.

    We are talking about a fight where Ortiz spent so much time running, and only running, that fighters threw about 10 punches per round. Wtf!!! What's that crap?? Ortiz shouldnt even be paid, let alone win more than 2 rounds.
     
    zelky likes this.
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,234
    78,526
    Nov 30, 2006
    Rubbish fight Ortíz clearly won.

    And like @CST80 pointed out, both of us picked López and were talking loads of trash about Ortíz beforehand. I find Teó annoying but hatred is a strong word.

    He cleanly defeated two guys I like way more than Ortíz (and both much better fighters than him overall, despite matching up worse h2h against Takeover), in TTT and Loma, fair & square - but he lost this one.
     
    CST80 and Badbot like this.
  6. Badbot

    Badbot I Am An Actual Pro. Full Member

    44,356
    31,987
    Apr 17, 2011
    Again, you don´t have to be aggressive to win rounds.
    It´s not a judging criteria.
    What is is effective aggression. Why effective? Because just because a fighter is aggressive doesn´t mean they are winning and should be rewarded points for that.

    Lopez wasn´t effective at all. He couldn´t cut off the ring nor could he land anything significant. They exchanged when Ortiz decided to engage.

    And yes, Ortiz was in control. He forced Lopez to fight at his pace. I know you despise compubox(so do I)m but it´s clear by the numbers that Lopez was unable to throw his usual amount. This is because Ortiz controlled the ring and the pace.
     
    CST80 likes this.
  7. Aizen

    Aizen Member Full Member

    138
    138
    Feb 10, 2023
    Are you guys serious? How can anyone give this fight to Teo? Daylight robbery that was.
     
    CST80 and Badbot like this.
  8. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,321
    11,767
    Jun 21, 2015
    Again, you only have to be agressive when the punches cannot decide the rounds. And this is the case here in most of the rounds.

    And again, running without throwing anything is not "being in control". Was charlo in control when he fought canelo? he didnt control **** that night, exactly the same Ortiz didnt control **** in this fight.

    Clearly we are not going to agree, we should agree on disagree.
     
  9. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    9,250
    11,911
    Mar 24, 2019
    I know @CST80 picked Lopez but he was hoping for an Ortiz win as were most on here.I have no favouritism regarding either fighter and scored it a draw and stick to my opinion
     
  10. Aizen

    Aizen Member Full Member

    138
    138
    Feb 10, 2023
    Haney and Tank ****s him up btw. This fight confirms it
     
  11. Badbot

    Badbot I Am An Actual Pro. Full Member

    44,356
    31,987
    Apr 17, 2011
    Its called effective aggression!
    If you can´t decide the round based on punches landed then clearly Lopez´s aggression was not effective :lol:
    We can agree to disagree but you are simply wrong.

    You don´t know how to score boxing and this is why guys like Canelo get ridiculous scorecards.
     
  12. Badbot

    Badbot I Am An Actual Pro. Full Member

    44,356
    31,987
    Apr 17, 2011
    It will be a miracle if Wahid fights someone in the top 5 of any division.
     
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,506
    18,170
    Oct 7, 2006
    Because Haney and Tank fight just like Ortiz right?
     
  14. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,321
    11,767
    Jun 21, 2015
    Effective agression, yes, the one with the most effective agression. Even if López's agresion was not very effective, Ortiz's was even less effective, to the point of being non-existent.

    Yes, we agree on that too, you are wrong.
     
  15. tdf1974

    tdf1974 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,990
    2,155
    Sep 9, 2013
    If I could I'd give them both an L or NC ...It was garbage and I'm still annoyed I woke up at 4 am to watch it
     
    Noel857 and Badbot like this.