Better durability: Holyfield or Tyson?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Ironfox222, Feb 22, 2024.


Who?

  1. Evander Holyfield

    39 vote(s)
    76.5%
  2. Mike Tyson

    12 vote(s)
    23.5%
  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,659
    14,032
    Jan 4, 2008
    Very much down to how you define chin.

    If we're talking about taking a hard, clean punch without showing much effect its's without a doubt Tyson. But if we're talking coming back from taking a beating it's without a doubt Holy.
     
  2. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,215
    10,924
    Sep 19, 2021
    Agreed. And when it comes to heart, I also rate Holyfield higher.
     
    RulesMakeItInteresting and Bokaj like this.
  3. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,757
    11,713
    Mar 23, 2019
    Me too.

    Mike was a total god during the 80s, but it's hard to match Evander's resilience (I put only Holmes, Ali, and Frazier up there with him in that respect).
     
  4. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,550
    29,180
    Jun 26, 2009
    Yeah, I’d say my definition of durability goes beyond just taking a beating — a durable fighter can weather a big storm (or a long, sustained one) and then recover to come back at his foe even stronger.

    Holy clearly gets higher marks in that area, IMO.
     
    young griffo likes this.
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,172
    49,427
    Apr 27, 2005
    Foreman is surely up there as well in winning the title back two decades after first winning it.
     
  6. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,498
    21,538
    Jul 30, 2014
    I’d add Liston to that list. I doubt any other boxer (or human being for that matter) who ever lived could’ve taken such flush shots from Williams’ and live to tell about it.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,172
    49,427
    Apr 27, 2005
    Yeah they would have been carried out in a coffin!!!! Heck there might not have been enough left to fill it.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  8. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,757
    11,713
    Mar 23, 2019
    I second that, my friend.

    Liston, too.
     
    JohnThomas1 and swagdelfadeel like this.
  9. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,792
    18,686
    Jan 6, 2017
    Tyson rarely got hit at his best. When he did, it was usually a glancing blow or one big bomb. He really didn't get hit by too many combinations until Douglas and then didn't get hit by anymore until Holyfield himself. When his chin was tested, Tyson was hard to hurt. But his recovery/heart weren't very good and he lost every single time he was floored or badly damaged. I'd give Tyson an 8/10 chin, 6/10 heart/recovery, 7/10 stamina.

    Evander Holyfield was rocked, wobbled, or dropped multiple times as a younger fighter against guys like Cooper, Bowe, Dokes, Foreman, etc. However, he always managed to gather his bearings and stay in the fight. He was only stopped when dealing with severe health issues against Bowe and the Toney loss when past his prime. Overall, I'd say he was a tad more durable than Tyson and was stopped less. Chin 8.5/10, 8/10 heart/recovery, 8/10 stamina.
     
    zadfrak likes this.