Professor Mike Donovan vs. Stanley Ketchel

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Melankomas, Feb 26, 2024.


  1. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    7,354
    9,093
    Dec 18, 2022
    Here's footage of Donovan (albeit old):

    This content is protected


    Footage of Ketchel:

    This content is protected


    Who's your pick? Prime for prime
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2024
    Reinhardt likes this.
  2. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,160
    19,350
    Oct 4, 2016

    I think this fight defines the word,,Brawl.
     
  3. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    7,354
    9,093
    Dec 18, 2022
    Yeah, Ketchel/Papke was really crude imo. It’s bizarre cuz Papke looks much better and more skilled in his fight against Carpentier.

    I just find it kind of funny, how a 60 year old Donovan displayed more skill than Ketchel, albeit slightly out of his prime, did.

    Donovan appeared to have peaked in the 1870s, and he surely must’ve looked much better in his prime than a play-spar in old age. It’s like 1870s best middleweight vs. 1900s best middleweight.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,435
    47,619
    Feb 11, 2005
    Was it obligatory to hold your chin on a kite string back in the day?
     
  5. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    7,354
    9,093
    Dec 18, 2022
    Judging from the manuals from that period, seems like it certainly wasn’t frowned upon. As long as you move your head, move your feet and parry like Donovan does. And to his credit, the old cotter does it pretty well. I see why Teddy Roosevelt opted taking lessons from the man.