George Foreman (1991) -vs- David Tua (1998)…

Could be a painful fight for George.
Maybe like the Stewart fight but worse for him.

 

Tua would beat the crap out of him. Foreman would never take the fight after struggling with Qawi.

 

It's an even older Foreman who was lucky to get by Stewart.

 

Same guy. It's not like he bulldozed Orlin Norris in 91 to prove that he had improved.

 

Tua wears him down and George does not go the distance ... George was too slow and did not have the volume of punching needed to keep Tua off him for twelve rounds and Tua was a monster puncher ..

 

Foreman of 1973.....why does everyone pick the fat older Foreman past his prime in these "Fantasy Fights?"

 

Old Foreman's cross arm defense and ability to parry is too good. Foreman's jab is too good and rangy. Foreman's right hand is too good and heavy, Foreman's chin is too good. Foreman's power is more than enough to keep Tua honest. I don't see any road to Tua winning this fight. Foreman is a horrendous style for Tua.

Tua would honestly have a better chance against young gunslinging Foreman than old Foreman, and I wouldn't give him much chance against him either.

 

Hi Buddy.
Good point, furthermore why do posters continually do that, invariable one of the fighters is pitched when either old, or fat, or both, why do this, let's have them at their very best for an honest assessment as to who would win when both are in their prime.
stay safe Rocky, chat soon.

 

I wonder how aggressive Tua would be after eating one of George's right hands, I mean Tua is going to come at George Foreman?