Mike Tyson had a better career than Larry Holmes.

Floyd Patterson won a vacant title, from an organization's belt that Mike Tyson won at a younger age than Patterson did. FACT.

 

But Mike wasn't undisputed, Patterson was.

 

As I've already said, I will stay right here and continue to school you and humiliate you and there's nothing you can do about it. Did I make myself clear, princess ?

 

It would change the fact, that Mike wasn't the youngest undisputed champion. I don't care about this particular record, but it is what it is.

 

You wouldn't recognize fact if it hit you in the face, princess.

You should stick to designing Tyson t-shirts and crying online about how pitiful little losers like yourself are being underappreciated by Tyson and his entourage

Perhaps you should move to YT comment section which is definitely more appropriate for the person of your limited capacities.

 

You can say Mike was the youngest fully unified champ. But he wasn't the youngest undisputed.

 

Well, if it is fruitless to compare eras, then all the records don't matter.

 

Yes, I would find 8 guys and I already named them.

 

If you are stubborn, you can write that Holyfield won against a better Holmes, against a younger Holmes, against a lighter Holmes and in a better style than Tyson, but this will be a subjective interpretation and even denying the facts... remind me of these 8 guys. Remind me the names of boxers who beat top rivals in the style of Tyson, knocked them out one by one over the course of 10 fights, and didn't even take a moment to relax for someone like Wepner, Stander, Scott Frank, Albert Sosnowski, Phil Jackson or Bert Cooper

 

There are no points awarded for what, “probably” happens.

 

No, cause it wouldn't be true. But you can make an argument Holyfield won against a better prepared version of Holmes.

Like I said, I put Ali, Louis, Holmes, Lennox, Evander, Marciano, Foreman and Frazier above Tyson. And like I said, Stander doesn't matter if you have probably the best win in heavyweight history in Ali in March 1971. Stander doesn't matter if the only losses you have are against all time greats like Ali and Foreman, while a boxer you are compared to lost to the likes of Buster Douglas, Danny Williams and Kevin McBride. You can't look at Tyson and ignore everything what happened after 1990. You just can't.