What do you guys consider the peak Tyson Fury's performance. Was it: 1. The bout with Wladimir Klitschko, where even in a snoozefest that the fight turned out to be, he boxed brilliantly moving around the ring, making Wlad gun shy, taking away his jab, which was the foundation of his offence, fainting the hell out of him, which resulted in not taking any damage from one of the hardest punchers in the history of the sport and winning clearly on the scorecards. 2. His demolition job on Deontay Wilder in their second fight, where he bullied and mauled him, dropped him 2 times (and really it should have been 3 or 4), completely shut him down not letting him throw that right hand, looking like a dad spanking his son. Which version of Fury would have faired better in the theoretical H2H comparisons?
A super champion on away soil who hadn't tasted defeat in 11 years, or a hype job with unreal power? It's obviously wlad
Win against Wlad is not legit, because he was 39 years old and way past his prime. Plus, Fury couldn't and much on Wlad either.
Yeah, the athlete who has never shown mental weakness or distraction in a 20 year career was suddenly so distracted that he forgot how to box against the slipperiest HW he's faced who happens to be taller and longer than him. Does that make sense to you? Will you go on to say that Distracted 39 year old Champ Vlad in Germany is somehow lesser than Dethroned 41 year old Vlad in England? Joshua fans are sad as hell since he got slapped around by a tub of lard.