A time warp has occurred, it's March 22 1967, Zora Folley has been injured in sparring. No.4 rated Joe Frazier has been notified that he would be taking Folley's place against World Heavyweight Champion Muhammad Ali in Madison Square Garden in a 15 round title bout, manager Yank Durham has two weeks to get Frazier ready along with trainer Eddie Futch. In Frazier's last bout on Sept 21 1966, he won a hotly disputed decision over Oscar Bonavena. What will be the outcome for the undefeated Frazier? How will this bout affect history as far as The Fight Of The Century in the future goes? Let's hear some comments.
Frazier puts on a great display of heart and skill, shocking many observers who gave him no chance, pushing Ali for 15 rounds, but is edged out by a prime Ali who is too elusive and skilful for a young Smokin Joe.
You know Dorian, that is how I envision it. Ali would not be laying on the ropes as he did in March 1971. Ali would have been active, his last bout before Frazier would have been a unanimous 15 round beating of WBA Champion Ernie Terrell on Feb 6 1967 in the Houston Astrodome. I think that this loss to peak Muhammad Ali would have given Joe Frazier all the confidence that he needed to further push his career upward, perhaps he defeats Ali in a rematch.
I agree Frazier probably takes the rematch, Frazier improved significantly after his first Bonavena fight, the trouble with assessing Frazier's performance against Ali in the FOTC and using it to extrapolate how he would do against '67 Ali is that Ali was a better and more agile fighter in his prime, while Frazier was a worse fighter in '67 and needed a lot of refinement to diversify his skillset and hone his craft.
In July 1967, Joe Frazier stopped George Chuvalo, he did not knock Chuvalo off of his feet but gave him a bad beating.
Ali clearly outpoints the gutsy Frazier by approx 10 - 5 in rounds. Frazier's face is swollen at the end and both eyes are nearly closed.
Ali gives Joe a good going over for the first 4-5 rounds but unlike the FOTC, - it doesn’t stop there - Ali doesn’t tire within himself and keeps going on with the job with loads of stamina to go. I also see Frazier’s face being badly damaged, and that much worse than it was in the FOTC, and that ultimately sees Joe being stopped sometime between rounds 10 and 15.
I am of the opinion that there was a huge difference between Muhammad Ali in 1967 and Muhammad Ali in 1971, after the layoff. And I would say that 1967 Joe Frazier is not quite at the level of 1971 Joe Frazier. I believe Ali gets off to commanding lead in the first 4 rounds in this hypothetical match up. I think Ali would be up 4 rounds to 0. I could see somewhat punished Frazier, with a puffed up face, coming on strong in the 5th and 6th rounds, but taking a a real beating in round 7. By the 8th round, with vision becoming a problem for Joe, I see most referees stepping in and halting the contest at that point. So I am going with Muhammad Ali by TKO in 8 rounds over Joe Frazier. I am going to say I still think Joe Frazier beats James Ellis and grabs the Heavyweight belt. When Muhammad Ali comes back, still undefeated, the idea of an Ali - Frazier rematch is not billed as "The Fight of the Century" any more, so Muhammad might even have a couple more tune up fights before the rematch with Frazier. Frankly, I do not think Joe Frazier ever beats Muhammad Ali under those circumstances, but the second fight is a tougher win for him than the first fight was. Another interesting problem this presents is what happens with George Foreman? Does he ever become Heavyweight Champion? If not, with no belt to lose, does he ever mount a comeback to try to win the belt? Does Ken Norton manage to get the belt away from Muhammad Ali? Could George then get it from Norton before facing Ali down the road, getting history more or less back on track but with Norton in place of Frazier?
A more competitive fight by both, Ali of 67 was far better than the rusty Ali of 71. Ali of 71 did not have legs or stamina anymore.