Has Usky just demolished the myth of the modern superheavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, May 18, 2024.


  1. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    Let's not forget that he won world and Olympic gold at HW in the amateurs.

    Why focus on him being a middleweight in the amateurs more than 15 years ago... what has that got to do with anything?
     
    USFBulls727 and Bokaj like this.
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,646
    Dec 31, 2009
    Usyk was a middleweight at the age of 18 or 19. Perhaps there were some 223lb heavyweights in the 1970s that were competing as middleweights at that kind of age?
     
  3. Niels Probst

    Niels Probst Member banned Full Member

    365
    199
    Dec 9, 2023
    Janitor, please, no more USKY!
     
    Clinton and Bokaj like this.
  4. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,442
    9,396
    Jun 9, 2010
    Agreed, although I think Lewis might stop him earlier.

    I too think Usyk is a great fighter, relative to his time, and he deserves considerable credit for what he has achieved but, in the cold light of day, his feats won't equate to his being some kind of cross-era-conquering ATG Heavyweight.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,743
    47,551
    Mar 21, 2007
    Of course; but when was that ever been in doubt? Nobody to my knoweldge has ever said if Joe Louis punched Lennox Lewis face 30 times, Lennox Lewis would be OK.

    The thread is about what Usyk's victory over Fury has proven.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,743
    47,551
    Mar 21, 2007
    Perhaps it doesn't matter, and you should stop obsessing about it.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,743
    47,551
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: @janitor, the people have spoken.
     
  8. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,442
    9,396
    Jun 9, 2010
    Plainly and simply, it has 'proven' that Usyk should be considered the best heavyweight in the world, at present.

    And that is all, really.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,743
    47,551
    Mar 21, 2007
    He's proven to me that he's p4p #1 and the best post-Klitschko HW. But yeah.
     
    BobD99 likes this.
  10. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,312
    31,677
    Jan 14, 2022
    It seems to me you have two camps one that vastly overrates older fighters for example expecting 180 pound Heavyweights to beat Super Heavyweights is just silly.

    But then you have the other camp who overrate these Super Heavyweights and think they would beat any smaller Heavyweight just because of size, even though there is plenty examples of smaller elite Heavyweights beating Super Heavyweights. They also don't take into account how fighters match up which for me is the most important aspect.

    All in all I think any reasonable boxing fan will have a balanced opinion in regards to smaller skillful Heavyweights between 200-220 being able to have success and vice a versa with Super Heavyweights.

    I don't think Usyk has changed that opinion though because Holyfield has showed he could beat much bigger Super Heavyweights and so did Chris Byrd to an extent.
     
  11. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,442
    9,396
    Jun 9, 2010
    That's fair.

    Although, hypothetically, should a rematch take place this year and Fury reverses the result, then there might be a case against your second point, in my opinion.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,743
    47,551
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, it boils down to Fury-Usyk and if they rematch and Fury wins it's probably Fury, though it depends how it pans out. Fury looks vulnerable now though. He was at his most successful when coming forwards but it's clear he's vulnerable to Usyk's punches now - a plan will be hard to com by I think.
     
    BobD99 and swagdelfadeel like this.
  13. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,950
    20,284
    Jul 30, 2014
    Honestly, considering Fury's mental state, and his post fight interview (Happy new year.... wtf) It's very possible he could suffer a mental breakdown like he did following the bout with Klitschko.
     
    USFBulls727, choklab and Man_Machine like this.
  14. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,442
    9,396
    Jun 9, 2010
    Agreed.

    I find the whole 'size argument' is too often generalized into the extremes, such as you have outlined, beyond being meaningful. It's a massive and unnecessary distraction away from other important facets of a fight - like actual styles, skills, tactics, for example.

    Wide size differences in heavyweight boxing are as old as the division itself, with mixed results.
    I can't take the topic too seriously, these days - even though it does stir up lively debate and generates a few gems here and there.
     
  15. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,442
    9,396
    Jun 9, 2010
    Agreed. Fury's plan will be high-risk, either way, and he'll need to bring something extra to push the envelope - because I'm sure Usyk will be looking to improve on his performance too.