If fury is very bad .. usyk is not so good!

Uysk is awesome. Now officially the best heavy since at least 2015.

 

Yep let's ignore the fact that Usyk was 37,5 years old, and Fury was 19 months younger, had 40 lbs advantage, 20cm. reach, 19 cm height advantage, referee and judges on his hands.

Did you see the stoppages tonight? Fury was essentially stopped by Usyk in the 9th round. He was saved by the paid crock.

Warren is clearly paying the referees for his Fighters. Dubois - Hrgovic confirms it.

 

Wilders losses don't decrease Fury's ability in my view just his resume. At his best he's a tremendous fighter and arguably the 2nd best heavy on the planet. But his resume is definitely lacking.

 

You can twist anything to fit your narratives but Usyk has achieved undisputed at 2 weight classes whilst remaining unbeaten. That is the stuff of an ATG no matter what BS people come up with.

 

This content is protected

 

Is this the best you can do?

 

Lol. At first I thought you were serious. But you are just bored and trolling as nobody with a sane mind can actually believe any of that.

 

Regardless of what one thinks of Wilder or his career, it should be embarrassingly obvious from his present form that he is absolutely shot.

I'm no Fury apologist, but the Wilder we just watched tonight was completely lacking in the kind of explosive athleticism---however technically flawed---he once possessed.

 

You should put all this material into one stand up comedy routine, mate. I'm pretty sure there are many sports bars who would be interested in having you. This is comedy gold really.

 

This is one of the worst HW eras of my lifetime. Possibly the worst.

 

What do you define as being top level?
Who do you rate as being top level (at heavyweight)?