Heavyweight Division Depth by Decade: Let's Discuss the Rankings

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by themaster458, Jun 11, 2024.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,529
    28,743
    Jun 2, 2006
    Liston beat ONE ranked challenger in the 1950's MIke DeJohn no 10.
    You calling anyone dumb is rich!

    My question was were those I named .

    Gardner
    Sys
    Williams
    Cockell
    Holman
    Summerlin
    Dunlap
    Johnson
    Oma
    Savold
    TOP NOTCH TALENT? And you did NOT answer it!
     
  2. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    8,516
    Aug 15, 2018
    I don’t give a shite if Liston was ranked he beat Dejohn Valdez and Williams in 59 alone and was fighting since 53
     
  3. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    8,516
    Aug 15, 2018
    I literally stated they r leftovers in my comment but I suppose reading isn’t ur area of expertise as u seem to ignore anything u don’t want to read. Now please show me the lists of other decades of top 20 fighters u think r so much better. Shouldn’t be difficult
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,529
    28,743
    Jun 2, 2006
    I have to give you Valdes,I forgot him.
    Williams was not ranked.So now you have 2 . That is NOT multiple wins.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,529
    28,743
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'll do that as soon as you answer my question.
    Were the following top notch talent?
    Gardner
    Sys
    Williams
    Cockell
    Holman
    Summerlin
    Dunlap
    Johnson
    Oma
    Savold
    TOP NOTCH TALENT?

    You've done what you always do start with the insults,next you'll be calling me a liar again and then apologising,not to me, to the forum.
     
  6. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    8,516
    Aug 15, 2018
    What does that have to do with him fighting in the 50s? He either fought in any part of the decade or he didn’t. He could have had one fight and qualified imo but he had seven years in the decade
     
  7. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,038
    3,513
    Jan 6, 2024
    Oh I agree and my rankings were done mostly using that. Just bringing up depth can mean different things and it really changes things for certain decades people are arguing about.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,529
    28,743
    Jun 2, 2006
    Two wins in the dacade is not multiple wins.
     
  9. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    8,516
    Aug 15, 2018
    Harold Johnson and Williams would be considered top notch talent but the rest are not. Savold and Oma were irrelevant to depth in the 50s. It’s like me saying evangelists, Dunn, standar and Ramos were the depth of the 70s. It’s a weird statement that has nothing to do w actual depth of the 50s
     
  10. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    8,516
    Aug 15, 2018
    I don’t care if had zero ranked wins. He fought 7 years in the decade. And more than one would be multiple. Not that it matters.
     
  11. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,798
    15,740
    Jul 2, 2006
    we don't have enough footage of 1980's to make any reasonable comparison

    If we look at 1930 onwards,

    1970's - Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Norton, Quarry, Shavers, Lyle and Bugner in the first half (in/near their primes) and Holmes, Young, etc. in the second half .

    1990's - Lewis and Holyfield throughout the decade, Bowe in first half, Tyson only in 90-92, Morrison, Bruno, aging Foreman, Moorer, aging Holmes, Mercer and Witherspoon in the first half, then Tua, Ibeabuchi, Briggs in the second half.

    Note: i am looking at guys when they were in/near their primes. For example , 96 Tyson is considerably removed from his prime, as is 77 Ali.

    1960's: Ali for the entire decade minus exile, Liston from 60-64, young Frazier from 67-69, Bonavena, Quarry, Patterson, Williams in the early part of the decade, Terrell, Folley.

    1980's: Holmes for first half, Tyson for second half. Two ATG's who peaked at different times in the decade. A legit top 30 all time guy in Witherspoon. Tony Tucker was decent. Massive underachievers but some solid guys in Pinklon Thomas, Buster Douglas, Michael Dokes, Gerrie Coetzee, Gerry Cooney etc. Just an era of big underachievers to be honest.

    1930's
    2000's
    2010's
    1950's
    1940's

    I am a bit confused as to where to rank 2020's but i suspect it will be higher than all of the above except 1970's and 1990's. We have already seen the brilliance of Usyk for the past 4 years. We have seen good performances from Joshua, Parker, Zhang, even guys like Joyce. Throw in the inconsistent Fury and Ruiz and the one dimensional Wilder plus guys like Kabayel and the emerging guys, i think it will surpass the 1980's at some point. It certainly is a better era than the 2010's (especially the first half).
     
    OddR likes this.
  12. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,786
    19,998
    Jul 30, 2014
    You just called Williams a bum in another thread, now he's top-notch talent?
     
    mcvey likes this.
  13. themaster458

    themaster458 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,185
    2,679
    May 17, 2022
    For sure 2020s looks really good rn especially with Saudi money bankrolling it lol
     
    OddR and dmt like this.
  14. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,798
    15,740
    Jul 2, 2006
    The Saudi's probably won't do it forever but as long as they are doing it, we will see some great fights in this decade, particularly at heavy. I suspect the next ATG heavy will emerge in this decade.
     
    OddR likes this.
  15. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    8,516
    Aug 15, 2018
    I said he would be considered by many…which he is. I personally think he’s a C fighter.